Skip to main content
cancel
Showing results for 
Search instead for 
Did you mean: 

Next up in the FabCon + SQLCon recap series: The roadmap for Microsoft SQL and Maximizing Developer experiences in Fabric. All sessions are available on-demand after the live show. Register now

Share your ideas and vote for future features

0 Votes
Status: New
0 Votes
Status: New
0 Votes
Status: New
  • Custom Visuals
0 Votes
Status: New
  • Custom Visuals
0 Votes
Status: New
  • Custom Visuals
0 Votes
Status: New
0 Votes
Status: New
  • Custom Visuals
0 Votes
Status: New
  • Custom Visuals
0 Votes
Status: Accepted

We are working on a fix for this. There are other small issues with Auto datalabel placement for columns/bars related to this one. All data is correct, but placement may change and this can impact layout.

Status: Delivered

Sounds like MAQ team ack'd this, it is external to Microsoft.

  • Custom Visuals
0 Votes
Status: Investigating

Thanks for reporting, any more details about actual data ranges of the overlaid charts and axis extent values that are calculated by the measure would help. We made some improvements to the axis extent calculations that can be affected by many things, including marker thickness or reference lines or total labels etc. and it's possible that overlaying two charts will still come up with the same range, but one may adjust the plot area a bit to allow for axis overflow.

  • Custom Visuals
0 Votes
Status: New
  • Custom Visuals
0 Votes
Status: New
  • Custom Visuals
0 Votes
Status: New
0 Votes
Status: New
  • Custom Visuals
0 Votes
Status: New
0 Votes
Status: New
  • Custom Visuals
0 Votes
Status: New
0 Votes
Status: New
  • Custom Visuals
0 Votes
Status: New
  • Custom Visuals
Idea Statuses