Fabric is Generally Available. Browse Fabric Presentations. Work
towards your Fabric certification with the Cloud Skills Challenge.
I'm having some trouble with syncing slicers that contain Field parameters.
It seems to work with regular columns but as soon as I replace them with the parameters, it's acting weird.
Already opened a topic somewhere else for help (and a bit more context):
The function of field parameters is to generate a dynamic value for the field you added and add it to the corresponding visuals to filter the corresponding data .
Judging from your current operation, you have each generated a field parameter to control their respective tables. How do you synchronize with each other? Neither is directly related.
Best Regards,Community Support Team _ Ailsa Tao
I tried to restore your scene, but failed. Can you provide your sample or pbix file(remove sensitive info) for our reference, which may help us solve the problem better.
Hi @v-yetao1-msft !
You can download the file with the problem hereThe dataset if necessary
Hi @v-yetao1-msft ,
That's correct. The only relationship that exists is through the visual slicer.
In our past situation, instead of the parameter, we had a copy of a date table as an extra table to do something with Time intelligence. In a specific case, we had 2 extra date tables (for different purposes in the model). To make sure they filtered the same thing on the dashboard, we made 2 slicers, synced them, and hid one. So there are no direct relations, but only for visualization purposes.
Having 2 extra date tables is not the most ideal situation, so we wanted to get this case with the parameters instead of the extra date-tables. It worked for us with the extra date tables, not with the parameters.
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.