As sad as it is, there needs to be focus on one way forward - that appears to be tabular. A migration path is needed, but having the two models is confusing and becoming unnecessary. Even if full support for MD features is not available I think this should still happen.
5 Comments
- pedro8New MemberThis is an extremely obtuse assertion. Multidimensional cubes are a different architecture which has its place in the enterprise and more often I find myself having to deploy both tabular and multidimensional models. Tabular has some advantages but it haves some serious limitations as well, and this is simply the way it is. In fact the more I use SSAS in tabular mode the more I find its limitations to be infuriating. One might as well say they want to deprecate pencils because of pens. If MSFT ever deprecated MD models they would be losing their competitive advantage to the likes of IBM and Oracle.
- Adrian_TheumaNew MemberI agree Pedro. I can't see this ever happening without Tabular first catching up to MD.
- fimianiNew MemberAgreed. There are a number of gaps that MD has that Tablular does not, and a few in the other direction as well. Tabular shortcomings when compared to MD: * write-back, * non-leaf writeback, * many-to-many, * unary operators, * several other critical things... Tabular upside compared to MD: * ability to on-the-fly model (add user-defined measures, dimension, granularities, hierarchies), * faster query times so I've heard, * other stuff? By no means an all-inclusive list. All that MS has to do is build out a gateway on top of MD that serves up the MD data as flattened Tabular slices, and there wouldn't be any issue here. Guess I'm just compelled to use Tableau until they get all of this resolved.
- pedro8New Member'@tf: Another serious limitation for me is the Direct query functionality of tabular models, which is meant to be analogous to ROLAP cubes. The fact is that when you turn direct query on, we get a severe set of limitations, which in my view makes Direct Query as useful as an ashtray on a motorbike :) For example we cannot use direct query when combining multiple data sources. This means that creating a tabular model to query line of business applications is inpractical since I cannot combine it with other data-sources, such as a date dimension from another DB.
- fbcideas_migusrNew MemberStatus added:New
Recent ideas
Make workspace and item session persistence optional
Description The new persistent session behavior in Microsoft Fabric should be optional rather than forced. Currently, Fabric remembers the workspaces and items that were open in my previous session...TeemuMultanen55 minutes agoAdvocate INew252Views42likes1CommentWhy are Calculation Groups so hard to modify?
Is there a way to make it easier to modify the DAX in a calculation group? I'm not sure if it's just me that finds this so annoying, but perhaps it's because I just started using calculation groups. ...AaronReasoner2 hours agoNew MemberNew2Views0likes0CommentsFeature Request: Add a Warning Prompt Before Deleting Tables That Contain Measures
Problem Statement: In Power BI, measures are linked to specific tables. When a developer deletes a table from the model view or report view, Power BI automatically deletes all measures assigned to ...Murtaza_Ghafoor4 hours agoSuper UserNew13Views2likes0CommentsCustom visuals: allow same-tab navigation & reduce confirm-navigation friction for trusted links
Description: Custom visuals (e.g. Deneb) that trigger navigation via href currently have two limitations that create friction for legitimate, author-controlled use cases: Links always open in a ne...AlexSenEON6 hours agoNew MemberNew9Views0likes0Comments