Join us at FabCon Atlanta from March 16 - 20, 2026, for the ultimate Fabric, Power BI, AI and SQL community-led event. Save $200 with code FABCOMM.
Register now!To celebrate FabCon Vienna, we are offering 50% off select exams. Ends October 3rd. Request your discount now.
Hello, please can someone explain why these two measures produce different results (something to do with the AND/OR but I don't understand why these would differ)? (I am reposting this as I made an error in my original post)
measure 1 check (no.) =
CALCULATE (
COUNT ( fct_core[colour] ),
fct_core[type] = 1
|| fct_core[type] = 2
|| fct_core[type] = 3
&& fct_core[colour] = 5
|| fct_core[colour] = 6
|| fct_core[colour] = 7
|| fct_core[colour] = 8
)
and:
measure 2 check (no.) =
CALCULATE (
COUNT ( fct_core[colour] ),
fct_core[type] >= 1
&& fct_core[type] <= 3
&& fct_core[colour] = 5
|| fct_core[colour] = 6
|| fct_core[colour] = 7
|| fct_core[colour] = 8
)
thanks,
A
Solved! Go to Solution.
Suppose you have type 2 and color 4. Then measure 1 would count it but not measure 2.
Note that your logical combination
T1 || T2 || T3 && C5 || C6 || C7 || C8
is equivalent to
T1 || T2 || (T3 && C5) || C6 || C7 || C8
not as I think you intended
(T1 || T2 || T3) && (C5 || C6 || C7 || C8)
I'd rewrite the measure as
check (no.) =
CALCULATE (
COUNT ( fct_core[colour] ),
fct_core[type] IN { 1, 2, 3 },
fct_core[colour] IN { 5, 6, 7, 8 }
)
Suppose you have type 2 and color 4. Then measure 1 would count it but not measure 2.
Note that your logical combination
T1 || T2 || T3 && C5 || C6 || C7 || C8
is equivalent to
T1 || T2 || (T3 && C5) || C6 || C7 || C8
not as I think you intended
(T1 || T2 || T3) && (C5 || C6 || C7 || C8)
I'd rewrite the measure as
check (no.) =
CALCULATE (
COUNT ( fct_core[colour] ),
fct_core[type] IN { 1, 2, 3 },
fct_core[colour] IN { 5, 6, 7, 8 }
)
That is really helpful, thanks Alexis and for stackoverflow too!