This is best Fabric, Power BI, SQL and AI community event. How do we know? The last event sold out! Save €200 with code FABCMTY200.
Register nowThe Fabric community is upgrading! Read all of the details including the timeline and what you can expect. Learn more
Hi All
I have a very simple problem that got me scracthing my head.
I have two tables one filtering the other 1 to * on an inactive relationship
is there way to count the related rows from the Employee table against the projects without using UseRelationship?
(and I am almost certain that I need to use RELATEDTABLE but couldn't figure out how.)
The measure I use is the following which works but I don't want to use it from efficiency standpoint.
desired ouput:
Solved! Go to Solution.
Hi @muturuf
Generally, the best way to implement "virtual relationships" is with TREATAS.
See this article:
https://www.sqlbi.com/articles/propagate-filters-using-treatas-in-dax/
In this case, it would look like:
CALCULATE (
COUNTROWS ( 'Employee' ),
TREATAS (
VALUES ( 'Project'[ProjectId] ),
'Employee'[ProjectId]
)
)
Out of interest, why do you want to avoid USERELATIONSHIP in this case?
Hi @muturuf
Generally, the best way to implement "virtual relationships" is with TREATAS.
See this article:
https://www.sqlbi.com/articles/propagate-filters-using-treatas-in-dax/
In this case, it would look like:
CALCULATE (
COUNTROWS ( 'Employee' ),
TREATAS (
VALUES ( 'Project'[ProjectId] ),
'Employee'[ProjectId]
)
)
Out of interest, why do you want to avoid USERELATIONSHIP in this case?
Join us in Barcelona for FabCon and SQLCon, the Fabric, Power BI, SQL, and AI community event. Save €200 with code FABCMTY200.
| User | Count |
|---|---|
| 24 | |
| 22 | |
| 20 | |
| 18 | |
| 14 |
| User | Count |
|---|---|
| 44 | |
| 36 | |
| 23 | |
| 20 | |
| 20 |