Get certified for free when you join Fabric Data Days 2026 and dive into Fabric, Power BI, SQL, AI, and other essential data skills.
Join nowJuly 7 - July 17 | Round 2 of the Power BI Dataviz World Championships. Don't miss your chance! Learn more
Hi All
I have a very simple problem that got me scracthing my head.
I have two tables one filtering the other 1 to * on an inactive relationship
is there way to count the related rows from the Employee table against the projects without using UseRelationship?
(and I am almost certain that I need to use RELATEDTABLE but couldn't figure out how.)
The measure I use is the following which works but I don't want to use it from efficiency standpoint.
desired ouput:
Solved! Go to Solution.
Hi @muturuf
Generally, the best way to implement "virtual relationships" is with TREATAS.
See this article:
https://www.sqlbi.com/articles/propagate-filters-using-treatas-in-dax/
In this case, it would look like:
CALCULATE (
COUNTROWS ( 'Employee' ),
TREATAS (
VALUES ( 'Project'[ProjectId] ),
'Employee'[ProjectId]
)
)
Out of interest, why do you want to avoid USERELATIONSHIP in this case?
Hi @muturuf
Generally, the best way to implement "virtual relationships" is with TREATAS.
See this article:
https://www.sqlbi.com/articles/propagate-filters-using-treatas-in-dax/
In this case, it would look like:
CALCULATE (
COUNTROWS ( 'Employee' ),
TREATAS (
VALUES ( 'Project'[ProjectId] ),
'Employee'[ProjectId]
)
)
Out of interest, why do you want to avoid USERELATIONSHIP in this case?
Join us in Barcelona for FabCon and SQLCon, the Fabric, Power BI, SQL, and AI community event. Save €200 with code FABCMTY200.
Join Fabric Data Days 2026: 60 days of free live/on-demand sessions, challenges, study groups, and certification opportunities.
| User | Count |
|---|---|
| 22 | |
| 22 | |
| 18 | |
| 16 | |
| 13 |
| User | Count |
|---|---|
| 63 | |
| 41 | |
| 40 | |
| 39 | |
| 38 |