This is best Fabric, Power BI, SQL and AI community event. How do we know? The last event sold out! Save €200 with code FABCMTY200.
Register nowA new Data Days event is coming soon! This time we’re going bigger than ever. Fabric, Power BI, SQL, AI and more. Don't miss out.
Hi All
I have a very simple problem that got me scracthing my head.
I have two tables one filtering the other 1 to * on an inactive relationship
is there way to count the related rows from the Employee table against the projects without using UseRelationship?
(and I am almost certain that I need to use RELATEDTABLE but couldn't figure out how.)
The measure I use is the following which works but I don't want to use it from efficiency standpoint.
desired ouput:
Solved! Go to Solution.
Hi @muturuf
Generally, the best way to implement "virtual relationships" is with TREATAS.
See this article:
https://www.sqlbi.com/articles/propagate-filters-using-treatas-in-dax/
In this case, it would look like:
CALCULATE (
COUNTROWS ( 'Employee' ),
TREATAS (
VALUES ( 'Project'[ProjectId] ),
'Employee'[ProjectId]
)
)
Out of interest, why do you want to avoid USERELATIONSHIP in this case?
Hi @muturuf
Generally, the best way to implement "virtual relationships" is with TREATAS.
See this article:
https://www.sqlbi.com/articles/propagate-filters-using-treatas-in-dax/
In this case, it would look like:
CALCULATE (
COUNTROWS ( 'Employee' ),
TREATAS (
VALUES ( 'Project'[ProjectId] ),
'Employee'[ProjectId]
)
)
Out of interest, why do you want to avoid USERELATIONSHIP in this case?
Check out the May 2026 Power BI update to learn about new features.
Sign up to receive a private message when registration opens and key events begin.
If you have recently started exploring Fabric, we'd love to hear how it's going. Your feedback can help with product improvements.
| User | Count |
|---|---|
| 29 | |
| 27 | |
| 25 | |
| 19 | |
| 14 |
| User | Count |
|---|---|
| 56 | |
| 48 | |
| 37 | |
| 21 | |
| 20 |