This is best Fabric, Power BI, SQL and AI community event. How do we know? The last event sold out! Save €200 with code FABCMTY200.
Register nowThe Fabric community is upgrading! Read all of the details including the timeline and what you can expect. Learn more
We recently moved away from import and are now running our solution using Direct Query. Is there any reason to keep our Premium Capacity around to support the solution?
Solved! Go to Solution.
Hi @bbutrimas
Please kindly refer to below comparison:
You can find that P2 has the double DQ connection amounts than P1, if you're going to change the connection mode to DQ, I'd suggest you taking the P2 .for large audience when access the DQ report, P2 could perform better.
@bbutrimas Just depends if you value anything on this list:
https://powerbi.microsoft.com/en-us/pricing/#powerbi-comparison-table\
Especially if you need to distribute to a large audience without paying for Pro for everyone.
Thanks this helps.
We are currenly using a p2. Would it makes sense to lower this to a P1 since we do not require the additional capacity anymore but require a license for a large audience?
Hi @bbutrimas
Please kindly refer to below comparison:
You can find that P2 has the double DQ connection amounts than P1, if you're going to change the connection mode to DQ, I'd suggest you taking the P2 .for large audience when access the DQ report, P2 could perform better.
Join us in Barcelona for FabCon and SQLCon, the Fabric, Power BI, SQL, and AI community event. Save €200 with code FABCMTY200.
| User | Count |
|---|---|
| 15 | |
| 11 | |
| 9 | |
| 8 | |
| 6 |