Don't miss your chance to take the Fabric Data Engineer (DP-700) exam on us!
Learn moreWe've captured the moments from FabCon & SQLCon that everyone is talking about, and we are bringing them to the community, live and on-demand. Starts on April 14th. Register now
Hi, I'm concerned that with the number of fact tables that my data model is not correct. Would it be possible to show me where i've gone wrong? For the purposes of ease of reading i've unhid previously hidden columns.
Many thanks in advance.
It's possible that the Cost and Sub tables could be merged into the Product dimension somehow but having five fact tables isn't necessarily a problem.
Is there something specific that you're concerned about that seems wrong/incorrect?
Many thanks for your reply. My main concern is that the returns table aren't working in correlation with the dates and the average reviews are incorrect.
Hi @Jameswh91 ,
If it shows incorrect value based on these table relationships, perhaps it could be related to the cross filter direction(single and both), you can refer this document:
Adjusting Cross filter direction for a complex set of tables and relationships
In addition, a star schema table relationship could be more available, see:
Understand star schema and the importance for Power BI
Best Regards,
Community Support Team _ Yingjie Li
If this post helps, then please consider Accept it as the solution to help the other members find it more quickly.
If you have recently started exploring Fabric, we'd love to hear how it's going. Your feedback can help with product improvements.
A new Power BI DataViz World Championship is coming this June! Don't miss out on submitting your entry.
Share feedback directly with Fabric product managers, participate in targeted research studies and influence the Fabric roadmap.
| User | Count |
|---|---|
| 5 | |
| 4 | |
| 3 | |
| 3 | |
| 2 |
| User | Count |
|---|---|
| 8 | |
| 8 | |
| 6 | |
| 6 | |
| 5 |