Skip to main content
cancel
Showing results for 
Search instead for 
Did you mean: 

The ultimate Microsoft Fabric, Power BI, Azure AI & SQL learning event! Join us in Las Vegas from March 26-28, 2024. Use code MSCUST for a $100 discount. Register Now

Reply
gauravnarchal
Post Prodigy
Post Prodigy

Measure to compare values in two different table

Hello, I need help to check if the numbers in table 1 are available in table 2 and find out the ones that do not exist in table 2. True / False.

 

I need this as measure and don't want to create a calculated column,

 

Table 1

 

Number
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15

 

Table 2

 

Number
1
3
7
8
10
12
13
15

 

Result

 

NumberResult
1TRUE
2FALSE
3TRUE
4FALSE
5FALSE
6FALSE
7TRUE
8TRUE
9FALSE
10TRUE
11FALSE
12TRUE
13TRUE
14FALSE
15TRUE
1 ACCEPTED SOLUTION
v-yalanwu-msft
Community Support
Community Support

Hi,  @gauravnarchal ;

Try it.

Result = IF(MAX('Table1'[Number]) in VALUES(Table2[Number]),"TRUE","FALSE")

The final output is shown below:

vyalanwumsft_0-1643855368920.png
Best Regards,
Community Support Team_ Yalan Wu
If this post helps, then please consider Accept it as the solution to help the other members find it more quickly.

View solution in original post

5 REPLIES 5
bigchippah
Helper I
Helper I

@v-yalanwu-msft, @MargaritaG, @Tahreem24, @amitchandak 

Not to piggyback, but I have an additional question to the above solutions.

 

Table 1 is an employee roster. (Employee ID, name, work location)

Table 2 is a list of employees who have been audited (Employee ID, name, date audited)

 

The measures above show me a True/False if an employee appears on Table 2 (the audit list).  However, I would like to use a slicer to filter by work location.  Currently, my slicer returns the entire list of employees (with the correct True/False result ) instead of only those who are assigned to the sliced/selected work location.

 

Any ideas?

v-yalanwu-msft
Community Support
Community Support

Hi,  @gauravnarchal ;

Try it.

Result = IF(MAX('Table1'[Number]) in VALUES(Table2[Number]),"TRUE","FALSE")

The final output is shown below:

vyalanwumsft_0-1643855368920.png
Best Regards,
Community Support Team_ Yalan Wu
If this post helps, then please consider Accept it as the solution to help the other members find it more quickly.

MargaritaG
Resolver I
Resolver I

Hey, 
You could write measure like this to get the solution required.

MargaritaG_0-1643365116499.png

Let me know if this works!

Tahreem24
Super User
Super User

@gauravnarchal Join the both table using relationship. Then create a measure in table 1:

Match = IF(SUM(Table1[Number]) IN {SUM(Table2[Number])}, TRUE(),FALSE())
Capture.PNG
 
Don't forget to give thumbs up and accept this as a solution if it helped you!!!

Please take a quick glance at newly created dashboards : Restaurant Management Dashboard , HR Analytics Report , Hotel Management Report, Sales Analysis Report , Fortune 500 Companies Analysis , Revenue Tracking Dashboard
amitchandak
Super User
Super User

@gauravnarchal , A measure to me used with table 1 Number

Measure = if(isblank(COUNTX(filter(Table1, Table1[Number] in values(Table2[Number])),Table1[Number])), FALSE(),TRUE())

Helpful resources

Announcements
Fabric Community Conference

Microsoft Fabric Community Conference

Join us at our first-ever Microsoft Fabric Community Conference, March 26-28, 2024 in Las Vegas with 100+ sessions by community experts and Microsoft engineering.

February 2024 Update Carousel

Power BI Monthly Update - February 2024

Check out the February 2024 Power BI update to learn about new features.

Fabric Career Hub

Microsoft Fabric Career Hub

Explore career paths and learn resources in Fabric.

Fabric Partner Community

Microsoft Fabric Partner Community

Engage with the Fabric engineering team, hear of product updates, business opportunities, and resources in the Fabric Partner Community.