Don't miss your chance to take the Fabric Data Engineer (DP-700) exam on us!
Learn moreNext up in the FabCon + SQLCon recap series: The roadmap for Microsoft SQL and Maximizing Developer experiences in Fabric. All sessions are available on-demand after the live show. Register now
Hello
I would like a column that shows whether or not a column in Table2 contains values that are in Table1.
| Table1 | |
| Value | New Column |
| A | TRUE |
| B | FALSE |
| C | TRUE |
| D | FALSE |
| E | TRUE |
| Table2 |
| Value |
| A |
| C |
| E |
Any Ideas?
Thanks!
Solved! Go to Solution.
Hi @bullius. If table 2 contains only unique values, you could relate the two tables on the Value column, and then use this formula for your New Column:
New Column = NOT(ISBLANK(RELATED(Table2[Value])))
You can also use the formula below, which will work with or without the relationship:
New Column = CALCULATE(COUNTROWS(Table2), FILTER(Table2, Table2[Value]=Table1[Value])) > 0
See this post for more information about how each method works.
I know KGrice's formula worked but it does seem a tad clunky... you could consider this as a slightly cleaner alternative (since the CONTAINS function exists exactly for this purpose):
Column = CONTAINS(Table2, Table2[Value], Table1[Value])
Hi @bullius. If table 2 contains only unique values, you could relate the two tables on the Value column, and then use this formula for your New Column:
New Column = NOT(ISBLANK(RELATED(Table2[Value])))
You can also use the formula below, which will work with or without the relationship:
New Column = CALCULATE(COUNTROWS(Table2), FILTER(Table2, Table2[Value]=Table1[Value])) > 0
See this post for more information about how each method works.
Although I have a relationship the second option is not working.
Thanks for the reply.
Table2 does not contain unique values...
Hi @bullius. The unique values piece only matters for creating a relationship. The second option I listed does not require unique values in either table. Were you able to get that one working?
Yes! The second one does the job. Thanks!
I know KGrice's formula worked but it does seem a tad clunky... you could consider this as a slightly cleaner alternative (since the CONTAINS function exists exactly for this purpose):
Column = CONTAINS(Table2, Table2[Value], Table1[Value])
but with this method, there has to be a relationship established between tables, right ?
Thanks, @jahida. I hadn't come across the CONTAINS function yet. I'll start using that instead.
If you have recently started exploring Fabric, we'd love to hear how it's going. Your feedback can help with product improvements.
A new Power BI DataViz World Championship is coming this June! Don't miss out on submitting your entry.
Share feedback directly with Fabric product managers, participate in targeted research studies and influence the Fabric roadmap.
| User | Count |
|---|---|
| 50 | |
| 44 | |
| 42 | |
| 18 | |
| 18 |
| User | Count |
|---|---|
| 69 | |
| 69 | |
| 32 | |
| 32 | |
| 32 |