Advance your Data & AI career with 50 days of live learning, dataviz contests, hands-on challenges, study groups & certifications and more!
Get registeredJoin us at FabCon Atlanta from March 16 - 20, 2026, for the ultimate Fabric, Power BI, AI and SQL community-led event. Save $200 with code FABCOMM. Register now.
Hello
I would like a column that shows whether or not a column in Table2 contains values that are in Table1.
| Table1 | |
| Value | New Column |
| A | TRUE |
| B | FALSE |
| C | TRUE |
| D | FALSE |
| E | TRUE |
| Table2 |
| Value |
| A |
| C |
| E |
Any Ideas?
Thanks!
Solved! Go to Solution.
Hi @bullius. If table 2 contains only unique values, you could relate the two tables on the Value column, and then use this formula for your New Column:
New Column = NOT(ISBLANK(RELATED(Table2[Value])))
You can also use the formula below, which will work with or without the relationship:
New Column = CALCULATE(COUNTROWS(Table2), FILTER(Table2, Table2[Value]=Table1[Value])) > 0
See this post for more information about how each method works.
I know KGrice's formula worked but it does seem a tad clunky... you could consider this as a slightly cleaner alternative (since the CONTAINS function exists exactly for this purpose):
Column = CONTAINS(Table2, Table2[Value], Table1[Value])
Hi @bullius. If table 2 contains only unique values, you could relate the two tables on the Value column, and then use this formula for your New Column:
New Column = NOT(ISBLANK(RELATED(Table2[Value])))
You can also use the formula below, which will work with or without the relationship:
New Column = CALCULATE(COUNTROWS(Table2), FILTER(Table2, Table2[Value]=Table1[Value])) > 0
See this post for more information about how each method works.
Although I have a relationship the second option is not working.
Thanks for the reply.
Table2 does not contain unique values...
Hi @bullius. The unique values piece only matters for creating a relationship. The second option I listed does not require unique values in either table. Were you able to get that one working?
Yes! The second one does the job. Thanks!
I know KGrice's formula worked but it does seem a tad clunky... you could consider this as a slightly cleaner alternative (since the CONTAINS function exists exactly for this purpose):
Column = CONTAINS(Table2, Table2[Value], Table1[Value])
but with this method, there has to be a relationship established between tables, right ?
Thanks, @jahida. I hadn't come across the CONTAINS function yet. I'll start using that instead.
Join the Fabric FabCon Global Hackathon—running virtually through Nov 3. Open to all skill levels. $10,000 in prizes!
Check out the October 2025 Power BI update to learn about new features.
| User | Count |
|---|---|
| 76 | |
| 38 | |
| 31 | |
| 27 | |
| 26 |