Join us at FabCon Atlanta from March 16 - 20, 2026, for the ultimate Fabric, Power BI, AI and SQL community-led event. Save $200 with code FABCOMM.
Register now!The Power BI Data Visualization World Championships is back! It's time to submit your entry. Live now!
Hi All
I have a very simple problem that got me scracthing my head.
I have two tables one filtering the other 1 to * on an inactive relationship
is there way to count the related rows from the Employee table against the projects without using UseRelationship?
(and I am almost certain that I need to use RELATEDTABLE but couldn't figure out how.)
The measure I use is the following which works but I don't want to use it from efficiency standpoint.
desired ouput:
Solved! Go to Solution.
Hi @muturuf
Generally, the best way to implement "virtual relationships" is with TREATAS.
See this article:
https://www.sqlbi.com/articles/propagate-filters-using-treatas-in-dax/
In this case, it would look like:
CALCULATE (
COUNTROWS ( 'Employee' ),
TREATAS (
VALUES ( 'Project'[ProjectId] ),
'Employee'[ProjectId]
)
)
Out of interest, why do you want to avoid USERELATIONSHIP in this case?
Hi @muturuf
Generally, the best way to implement "virtual relationships" is with TREATAS.
See this article:
https://www.sqlbi.com/articles/propagate-filters-using-treatas-in-dax/
In this case, it would look like:
CALCULATE (
COUNTROWS ( 'Employee' ),
TREATAS (
VALUES ( 'Project'[ProjectId] ),
'Employee'[ProjectId]
)
)
Out of interest, why do you want to avoid USERELATIONSHIP in this case?
The Power BI Data Visualization World Championships is back! It's time to submit your entry.
Check out the January 2026 Power BI update to learn about new features.
| User | Count |
|---|---|
| 60 | |
| 49 | |
| 30 | |
| 25 | |
| 23 |
| User | Count |
|---|---|
| 131 | |
| 103 | |
| 58 | |
| 39 | |
| 31 |