The ultimate Microsoft Fabric, Power BI, Azure AI, and SQL learning event: Join us in Stockholm, September 24-27, 2024.
Save €200 with code MSCUST on top of early bird pricing!
Find everything you need to get certified on Fabric—skills challenges, live sessions, exam prep, role guidance, and more. Get started
Hi
I’m new do DAX and PowerBI and trying to get the hang of it, but I’m stuck. I will try to the best of my abilities describe what I need to do. I would like to create a new column in my datatable called “Category”, in which a text is added depending on conditions in the form of a “Code”. If no condition is found in my rules table, fetch the “DefaultCategory” from my suppliers table.
I have my Datatable as example below:
SupplierID | SupplierName | Amount | Code | Category |
123 | Name 1 | 1000 | 55 |
|
123 | Name 1 | 500 | 33 |
|
555 | Name 2 | 750 | 55 |
|
555 | Name 2 | 750 | 44 |
|
I also have a table for my suppliers:
SupplierID | SupplierName | DefaultCategory |
123 | Name 1 | Categoryname 1 |
555 | Name 2 | Categoryname 1 |
I also have a table for rules to override the DefaultCategory:
SupplierID | Code | NewCategory |
123 | 33 | Categoryname 2 |
555 | 44 | Categoryname 3 |
I would like the result to return like this:
ID | SupplierName | Amount | Code | Category |
123 | Name 1 | 1000 | 55 | Categoryname 1 |
123 | Name 1 | 500 | 33 | Categoryname 2 |
555 | Name 2 | 750 | 55 | Categoryname 1 |
555 | Name 2 | 750 | 44 | Categoryname 3 |
If anyone could help me I would really appreciate it.
Solved! Go to Solution.
I add an extra search value in the LOOKUPVALE() to match the first criteria. In the first line were checking the rule code and supplier, if they match with Data[Code]. We return the NewCategory. Otherwise the DefaultCategory.
Example:
IF(
LOOKUPVALUE(Rules[Code], Rules[SupplierIDCode], Data[SupplierIDCode], Rules[SupplierID], Data[SupplierID]) = Data[Code]
,
LOOKUPVALUE(Rules[NewCategory],Rules[Code],Data[Code]) & "From Rules"
,
LOOKUPVALUE(Suppliers[DefaultCategory],Suppliers[SupplierID],Data[SupplierID])
)
I've got myself in some trouble with this solution. While it works for single rows in the "Rules table", if there are multiple rules for the same supplier (other codes) then there is an error. I suppose I need another dimension of filters in the lookup?
Hi,
Im embedding pictures of the different tables down below.
Data table:
Supplier table:
Rules table:
What I've done to solve my problem is to create a new column, in both the Data and Rules table, with a CONCATENATE() of "SupplierID" and "Code", because it will always be a unique number in the Rules table. That way I could edit the LOOKUPVALUE() to match those values instead.
Im sure there is a more elegant solution to this that dont add unecessary size to the model.
See new example:
Hi,
Okay, could you change the first line with LOOKUPVALUE() to:
LOOKUPVALUE(Rules[Code], Rules[Code], 'Datatable'[Code]) = 'Datatable'[Code]
This is because your relationship is matching on more suppliers. But there can be only one matching value. In your rules table there are more matching values now. The code above is looking for one matching value in the code column. That is almost the same way you created with the CONCATENATE().
Did you made your relationship between the two tables on the suppliers column or on the code column?
Will you let me know if this works?
The relationship of the tables are setup on SupplierID - with one to many from the supplier table to both other tables:
If I change the code as you mention, it now returns a match even if there is none. (Added a new column for testing "Category2"). There is no rule for "Supplier 3" in the rules table.
I really do appreciate you taking your valuable time to help me!
Could you provide a sample .pbix file? Then I could test some things. Because I thought you connected Rules to Data and Suppliers to Data, but I was wrong.
I'm not allowed to upload a file here so try if you get access with this link: https://www.dropbox.com/sh/3lcca8y78bjtzet/AACqz8wG0nGPXXcSrGbu-F9Ma?dl=0
I've added some code to my example, but I worry that all the LOOKUPVALUE() will be very taxing on the system once the real data with maybe 200-300 000 rows are calculated.
I add an extra search value in the LOOKUPVALE() to match the first criteria. In the first line were checking the rule code and supplier, if they match with Data[Code]. We return the NewCategory. Otherwise the DefaultCategory.
Example:
IF(
LOOKUPVALUE(Rules[Code], Rules[SupplierIDCode], Data[SupplierIDCode], Rules[SupplierID], Data[SupplierID]) = Data[Code]
,
LOOKUPVALUE(Rules[NewCategory],Rules[Code],Data[Code]) & "From Rules"
,
LOOKUPVALUE(Suppliers[DefaultCategory],Suppliers[SupplierID],Data[SupplierID])
)
Yes, this worked! Thank you for your swift answer!
Join the community in Stockholm for expert Microsoft Fabric learning including a very exciting keynote from Arun Ulag, Corporate Vice President, Azure Data.
Check out the August 2024 Power BI update to learn about new features.
Learn from experts, get hands-on experience, and win awesome prizes.
User | Count |
---|---|
114 | |
80 | |
80 | |
48 | |
40 |
User | Count |
---|---|
150 | |
110 | |
64 | |
64 | |
57 |