Power BI is turning 10, and we’re marking the occasion with a special community challenge. Use your creativity to tell a story, uncover trends, or highlight something unexpected.
Get startedJoin us for an expert-led overview of the tools and concepts you'll need to become a Certified Power BI Data Analyst and pass exam PL-300. Register now.
Hi,
I have a fact table:
AccountType
1 | A |
2 | B |
3 | B |
4 | C |
2 | C |
1 | C |
1 | A |
3 | A |
1 | D |
4 | C |
With an Account dimension:
AccountName
1 | W |
2 | X |
3 | Y |
4 | Z |
So there is 4 Accounts (W, X, Y and Z) and the fact table has 4 Types (A, B, C and D).
I want to create a table showing the Account names that filters with a slicer for Type. The problem is that I don't want Type to be one of the columns displayed in the table. But if I don't include it in the table, the slicer won't apply and the table will just show a list of all accounts.
Does anyone know a way around this?
Solved! Go to Solution.
It sounds like you want bi-directional filtering on the relationship between the tables (I'm assuming you have a one-to-many relationship from Dimension[Account] 1 -->-- * Fact[Account] ).
Bi-directional relationships can cause relationship ambiguities though so it may be better to do the cross-filtering within whatever measures you are using.
It sounds like you want bi-directional filtering on the relationship between the tables (I'm assuming you have a one-to-many relationship from Dimension[Account] 1 -->-- * Fact[Account] ).
Bi-directional relationships can cause relationship ambiguities though so it may be better to do the cross-filtering within whatever measures you are using.
This is your chance to engage directly with the engineering team behind Fabric and Power BI. Share your experiences and shape the future.
Check out the June 2025 Power BI update to learn about new features.
User | Count |
---|---|
79 | |
78 | |
59 | |
36 | |
33 |
User | Count |
---|---|
98 | |
62 | |
56 | |
49 | |
41 |