Get certified for free when you join Fabric Data Days 2026 and dive into Fabric, Power BI, SQL, AI, and other essential data skills.
Join nowJuly 7 - July 17 | Round 2 of the Power BI Dataviz World Championships. Don't miss your chance! Learn more
Hi,
I have a fact table:
AccountType
| 1 | A |
| 2 | B |
| 3 | B |
| 4 | C |
| 2 | C |
| 1 | C |
| 1 | A |
| 3 | A |
| 1 | D |
| 4 | C |
With an Account dimension:
AccountName
| 1 | W |
| 2 | X |
| 3 | Y |
| 4 | Z |
So there is 4 Accounts (W, X, Y and Z) and the fact table has 4 Types (A, B, C and D).
I want to create a table showing the Account names that filters with a slicer for Type. The problem is that I don't want Type to be one of the columns displayed in the table. But if I don't include it in the table, the slicer won't apply and the table will just show a list of all accounts.
Does anyone know a way around this?
Solved! Go to Solution.
It sounds like you want bi-directional filtering on the relationship between the tables (I'm assuming you have a one-to-many relationship from Dimension[Account] 1 -->-- * Fact[Account] ).
Bi-directional relationships can cause relationship ambiguities though so it may be better to do the cross-filtering within whatever measures you are using.
It sounds like you want bi-directional filtering on the relationship between the tables (I'm assuming you have a one-to-many relationship from Dimension[Account] 1 -->-- * Fact[Account] ).
Bi-directional relationships can cause relationship ambiguities though so it may be better to do the cross-filtering within whatever measures you are using.
Join us in Barcelona for FabCon and SQLCon, the Fabric, Power BI, SQL, and AI community event. Save €200 with code FABCMTY200.
Join Fabric Data Days 2026: 60 days of free live/on-demand sessions, challenges, study groups, and certification opportunities.
| User | Count |
|---|---|
| 22 | |
| 20 | |
| 14 | |
| 13 | |
| 13 |
| User | Count |
|---|---|
| 62 | |
| 40 | |
| 38 | |
| 38 | |
| 38 |