Join us at FabCon Atlanta from March 16 - 20, 2026, for the ultimate Fabric, Power BI, AI and SQL community-led event. Save $200 with code FABCOMM.
Register now!Vote for your favorite vizzies from the Power BI Dataviz World Championship submissions. Vote now!
Hi,
I have a fact table:
AccountType
| 1 | A |
| 2 | B |
| 3 | B |
| 4 | C |
| 2 | C |
| 1 | C |
| 1 | A |
| 3 | A |
| 1 | D |
| 4 | C |
With an Account dimension:
AccountName
| 1 | W |
| 2 | X |
| 3 | Y |
| 4 | Z |
So there is 4 Accounts (W, X, Y and Z) and the fact table has 4 Types (A, B, C and D).
I want to create a table showing the Account names that filters with a slicer for Type. The problem is that I don't want Type to be one of the columns displayed in the table. But if I don't include it in the table, the slicer won't apply and the table will just show a list of all accounts.
Does anyone know a way around this?
Solved! Go to Solution.
It sounds like you want bi-directional filtering on the relationship between the tables (I'm assuming you have a one-to-many relationship from Dimension[Account] 1 -->-- * Fact[Account] ).
Bi-directional relationships can cause relationship ambiguities though so it may be better to do the cross-filtering within whatever measures you are using.
It sounds like you want bi-directional filtering on the relationship between the tables (I'm assuming you have a one-to-many relationship from Dimension[Account] 1 -->-- * Fact[Account] ).
Bi-directional relationships can cause relationship ambiguities though so it may be better to do the cross-filtering within whatever measures you are using.
Vote for your favorite vizzies from the Power BI World Championship submissions!
If you love stickers, then you will definitely want to check out our Community Sticker Challenge!
Check out the January 2026 Power BI update to learn about new features.
| User | Count |
|---|---|
| 55 | |
| 53 | |
| 40 | |
| 17 | |
| 16 |
| User | Count |
|---|---|
| 123 | |
| 108 | |
| 44 | |
| 32 | |
| 26 |