Skip to main content
cancel
Showing results for 
Search instead for 
Did you mean: 

Join us at FabCon Atlanta from March 16 - 20, 2026, for the ultimate Fabric, Power BI, AI and SQL community-led event. Save $200 with code FABCOMM. Register now.

Reply
Chitemerere
Responsive Resident
Responsive Resident

Extract values from string with DAX

I have an attribute (column) called "Dissolution" from a table in Power BI which is a string with values in the string. I want to extract the values as new attributes (columns).  The sample column is as follows:

 

Screenshot 2020-06-02 at 21.32.19.png

 

The expected new columns are as follows:

 

Column 1Column 2Column 3
99.93%100.6% 
100.5%  
93.9%101.2%94.5%
96.9%98.4%93.2%

 

Thanking you and best regards,

Chris

1 ACCEPTED SOLUTION
Greg_Deckler
Community Champion
Community Champion

@Chitemerere - That's pretty ugly but I believe these will work:

 

Column 1 = 
    VAR __Pos = SEARCH("%",[Dissolution],,-1)
    VAR __Col = IF(__Pos=-1,-1,SEARCH(":",[Dissolution],__Pos - 8,-1))
RETURN
    IF(__Pos = -1 || __Col = -1,BLANK(),MID([Dissolution],__Col+2, __Pos-__Col-1))


Column 2 = 
    VAR __Pos1 = SEARCH("%",[Dissolution],,-1)
    VAR __Pos = SEARCH("%",[Dissolution],__Pos1 + 1,-1)
    VAR __Col = IF(__Pos=-1,-1,SEARCH(":",[Dissolution],__Pos - 8,-1))
RETURN
    IF(__Pos = -1 || __Col = -1,BLANK(),MID([Dissolution],__Col+2, __Pos-__Col-1))


Column 3 = 
    VAR __Pos1 = SEARCH("%",[Dissolution],,-1)
    VAR __Pos2 = SEARCH("%",[Dissolution],__Pos1 + 1,-1)
    VAR __Pos = IF(__Pos2 = -1,-1,SEARCH("%",[Dissolution],__Pos2 + 1,-1))
    VAR __Col = IF(__Pos=-1,-1,SEARCH(":",[Dissolution],__Pos - 8,-1))
RETURN
    IF(__Pos = -1 || __Col = -1,BLANK(),MID([Dissolution],__Col+2, __Pos-__Col-1))


Follow on LinkedIn
@ me in replies or I'll lose your thread!!!
Instead of a Kudo, please vote for this idea
Become an expert!: Enterprise DNA
External Tools: MSHGQM
YouTube Channel!: Microsoft Hates Greg
Latest book!:
DAX For Humans

DAX is easy, CALCULATE makes DAX hard...

View solution in original post

4 REPLIES 4
Greg_Deckler
Community Champion
Community Champion

@Chitemerere - That's pretty ugly but I believe these will work:

 

Column 1 = 
    VAR __Pos = SEARCH("%",[Dissolution],,-1)
    VAR __Col = IF(__Pos=-1,-1,SEARCH(":",[Dissolution],__Pos - 8,-1))
RETURN
    IF(__Pos = -1 || __Col = -1,BLANK(),MID([Dissolution],__Col+2, __Pos-__Col-1))


Column 2 = 
    VAR __Pos1 = SEARCH("%",[Dissolution],,-1)
    VAR __Pos = SEARCH("%",[Dissolution],__Pos1 + 1,-1)
    VAR __Col = IF(__Pos=-1,-1,SEARCH(":",[Dissolution],__Pos - 8,-1))
RETURN
    IF(__Pos = -1 || __Col = -1,BLANK(),MID([Dissolution],__Col+2, __Pos-__Col-1))


Column 3 = 
    VAR __Pos1 = SEARCH("%",[Dissolution],,-1)
    VAR __Pos2 = SEARCH("%",[Dissolution],__Pos1 + 1,-1)
    VAR __Pos = IF(__Pos2 = -1,-1,SEARCH("%",[Dissolution],__Pos2 + 1,-1))
    VAR __Col = IF(__Pos=-1,-1,SEARCH(":",[Dissolution],__Pos - 8,-1))
RETURN
    IF(__Pos = -1 || __Col = -1,BLANK(),MID([Dissolution],__Col+2, __Pos-__Col-1))


Follow on LinkedIn
@ me in replies or I'll lose your thread!!!
Instead of a Kudo, please vote for this idea
Become an expert!: Enterprise DNA
External Tools: MSHGQM
YouTube Channel!: Microsoft Hates Greg
Latest book!:
DAX For Humans

DAX is easy, CALCULATE makes DAX hard...

Thank you very much for your assistance, most appreciated.  It is the right direction but the results are not as expected.  Please find below actual results and expected results.

 

Dissolution

Column 1 (Actual)

Expected 1

Column 2 (Actual)

Expected 2

Column 3 (Actual)

Expected 3

Complies at S1

 

mean (n=6):

 

Lamivudine: 99.8% 

 

Zidovudine: 101.0%

100.00%

99.80%

 

101.00%

 

 

Complies at S1

 

mean (n=6):

 

Nevirapine: 98.3%

98.70%

98.30%

100.10%

 

 

 

Complies at S1

 

mean (n=6):

 

Nevirapine: 100.2%

101.00%

100.20%

102.70%

 

 

 

Complies at S1

 

mean (n=6):

 

Nevirapine: 101.5%

100.70%

101.50%

100.70%

 

 

 

Complies at S1

 

mean (n=6):

 

Nevirapine: 100.5%

98.30%

100.50%

98.00%

 

 

 

Complies at S1

 

mean (n=6):

 

Lamivudine: 96.0% 

 

Zidovudine: 95.3%

97.40%

96.00%

98.20%

95.30%

 

 

Complies at S1

 

mean (n=6):

 

Nevirapine: 100.2%

91.20%

100.20%

 

 

 

 

Complies at S1

 

mean (n=6):

 

Efavirenz: 98.7% 

 

Emtricitabine: 100.5% 

 

Tenofovir d.f.: 97.5%

95.30%

98.70%

94.90%

100.50%

 

97.50%

Complies at S1

 

mean (n=6):

 

Nevirapine: 98.0%

93.70%

98.00%

94.70%

 

 

 

Complies at S1

 

mean (n=6):

 

Efavirenz: 90.0% 

 

Emtricitabine: 98.8% 

 

Tenofovir d.f.: 92.5%

97.30%

90.00%

98.80%

98.80%

 

92.50%

Complies at S1

 

mean (n=6): 90.4%

103.20%

90.40%

 

 

 

 

Complies at S1

 

mean (n=6): 101.5%

111.10%

101.50%

 

 

 

 

Complies at S1

 

mean (n=6):

 

Nevirapine: 99.5%

98.60%

99.50%

99.00%

 

 

 

Complies at S1

 

mean (n=6):

 

Nevirapine: 98.8%

101.40%

98.80%

101.10%

 

 

 

Complies at S1

 

mean (n=6): 111.1%

89.20%

111.10%

88.30%

 

 

 

Complies at S1

 

mean (n=6): 103.2%

91.20%

103.20%

 

 

 

 

Complies at S1

 

mean (n=6): 97.3%

99.30%

97.30%

100.60%

 

 

 

Complies at S1

 

mean (n=6):

 

Lamivudine: 93.7% 

 

Zidovudine: 94.7%

101.40%

93.70%

101.50%

94.70%

 

 

Complies at S1

 

mean (n=6):

 

Lamivudine: 95.3% 

 

Zidovudine: 94.9%

101.30%

95.30%

101.10%

94.90%

 

 

Complies at S1

 

mean (n=6): 91.2%

92.50%

91.20%

 

 

 

 

Complies at S1

 

mean (n=6):

 

Lamivudine: 97.4% 

 

Zidovudine: 98.2%

104.00%

97.40%

 

98.20%

 

 

Complies at S1

 

mean (n=6):

 

Lamivudine: 98.3% 

 

Zidovudine: 98.0%

101.00%

98.30%

102.00%

98.00%

 

 

Complies at S1

 

mean (n=6):

 

Lamivudine: 100.7% 

 

Zidovudine: 100.7%

99.10%

100.70%

101.00%

100.70%

 

 

Complies at S1

 

mean (n=6):

 

Lamivudine: 101.0% 

 

Zidovudine: 102.7%

100.20%

101.00%

101.40%

102.70%

 

 

Complies at S1

 

mean (n=6):

 

Lamivudine: 95.2% 

 

Zidovudine: 103.6%

100.30%

95.20%

100.30%

103.60%

 

 

Complies at S1

 

mean (n=6):

 

Lamivudine: 96.3% 

 

Zidovudine: 100.5%

98.70%

96.30%

101.20%

100.50%

 

 

Complies at S1

 

mean (n=6):

 

Lamivudine: 96.8% 

 

Zidovudine: 102.7%

96.70%

96.80%

 

102.70%

 

 

Complies at S1

 

mean (n=6):

 

Lamivudine: 99.8% 

 

Zidovudine: 101.4%

97.70%

99.80%

 

101.40%

 

 

Complies at S1

 

mean (n=6):

 

Lamivudine: 100.1% 

 

Zidovudine: 101.5%

96.90%

100.10%

98.60%

101.50%

98.40%

 

Complies at S1

 

mean (n=6):

 

Lamivudine: 99.2% 

 

Zidovudine: 100.8%

96.20%

99.20%

99.70%

100.80%

97.90%

 

 

Best regards,

Chris

@Chitemerere - It's hard to say, it looks like it is inventing numbers that aren't actually in the row/column so no idea how that could be happening. You are implementing this as a column, correct? Not a measure?

 

Like your first row,

Complies at S1

 

mean (n=6):

 

Lamivudine: 99.8% 

 

Zidovudine: 101.0%

 

I don't see where the calculation could possibly get 100.00% That does not even seem possible to me because that number isn't even in the text anywhere. I'm attaching my working PBIX. You want Table (2). It is based on your original sample data.



Follow on LinkedIn
@ me in replies or I'll lose your thread!!!
Instead of a Kudo, please vote for this idea
Become an expert!: Enterprise DNA
External Tools: MSHGQM
YouTube Channel!: Microsoft Hates Greg
Latest book!:
DAX For Humans

DAX is easy, CALCULATE makes DAX hard...

Many thanks, managed to resolve the problem.

 

Regards,

Chris

Helpful resources

Announcements
October Power BI Update Carousel

Power BI Monthly Update - October 2025

Check out the October 2025 Power BI update to learn about new features.

FabCon Atlanta 2026 carousel

FabCon Atlanta 2026

Join us at FabCon Atlanta, March 16-20, for the ultimate Fabric, Power BI, AI and SQL community-led event. Save $200 with code FABCOMM.

Top Kudoed Authors