Starting December 3, join live sessions with database experts and the Microsoft product team to learn just how easy it is to get started
Learn moreGet certified in Microsoft Fabric—for free! For a limited time, get a free DP-600 exam voucher to use by the end of 2024. Register now
I have create a measure that sums another measure (reason for this is to correct the totals):
Measure 1 = if([Quantity] < 0 || [Price] < 0 || [Difference] = 0, 0, [Quantity] * [Price])
Measure 2 = SUMX('Table', [Measure 1]) <--- This total is 10,000
I then re-created the same measure using 'SUMMARIZE' trying to help with performance since 'Measure 2' (breaks the visual when applied with other measures)
Measure 3 = SUMX( SUMMARIZE( 'Table', 'Table'[ProductName] ), [Measure 1] ) <--- Total is 9,000
But when using this version, the total is 9,000, Why?
Also I know SUMX is hurting the performance (especially because of the conditional measure) , if anyone has any suggestions helping to optimize it would greatly be appreciated PLEASE and Thank you! (I can only create measure LIVE CONNECTION)
Solved! Go to Solution.
hi @Euro0681
Measure 2 scans the whole table, Measure 3 scans the unique list of 'Table'[ProductName]. It seems the 'Table'[ProductName] column has blank rows.
hi @Euro0681
Measure 2 scans the whole table, Measure 3 scans the unique list of 'Table'[ProductName]. It seems the 'Table'[ProductName] column has blank rows.
Thanks, I was thinking the same but was just wanting to get confirmation!
Starting December 3, join live sessions with database experts and the Fabric product team to learn just how easy it is to get started.
March 31 - April 2, 2025, in Las Vegas, Nevada. Use code MSCUST for a $150 discount! Early Bird pricing ends December 9th.
User | Count |
---|---|
22 | |
21 | |
20 | |
14 | |
11 |
User | Count |
---|---|
43 | |
34 | |
25 | |
23 | |
23 |