Skip to main content
cancel
Showing results for 
Search instead for 
Did you mean: 

The Power BI DataViz World Championships are on! With four chances to enter, you could win a spot in the LIVE Grand Finale in Las Vegas. Show off your skills.

Reply
Ackbar-Learner
Resolver I
Resolver I

Help with New Window function

Hi before i used below DAX to calculate running totals and it works fine.

Board02P&LRunningTotal = if(
     HASONEFILTER(TabPLGLItem[GLItem])
     ,
     CALCULATE(
             [Board01P&LAllTransactionAmountwithSign]
             ,
             ALL(TabPLGLItem[GLItem])
             ,
             TabPLGLItem[Index] <= VALUES(TabPLGLItem[Index])
             )
     ,
     blank()
)

 

Now I am trying my hand at the new Window function and wrote following DAX:

Board02aP&LRunningTotal = 
CALCULATE(
    [Board01P&LAllTransactionAmountwithSign],
    WINDOW(
        0,ABS,
        0,REL,
        SUMMARIZE(ALLSELECTED(TabPLGLItem),TabPLGLItem[GLItem]),
        ORDERBY(TabPLGLItem[GLItem])
    )
)

Unfortunately, it is not giving me the same result. See below screenshot:

It is returning the same previous measure, which was calculating amount per row item:

AckbarLearner_0-1674312399674.png

 

Any idea what might went wrong with the window function?

 

Thanks

 

1 ACCEPTED SOLUTION
OwenAuger
Super User
Super User

Hi @Ackbar-Learner 

 

To replicate the behaviour of your original measure using the WINDOW function, a measure like this should work:

Board02aP&LRunningTotal =
CALCULATE (
    [Board01P&LAllTransactionAmountwithSign],
    WINDOW (
        0, ABS,
        0, REL,
        ALL ( TabPLGLItem[GLItem], TabPLGLItem[Index] ),
        ORDERBY ( TabPLGLItem[Index] )
    )
)

Does this work as intended?

 

Explanation:

  • In order to order by TabPLGLItem[Index] for the running total, you must include TabPLGLItem[Index] in the Relation argument of WINDOW, and provide TabPLGLItem[Index] as the argument of ORDERBY.
  • Your original measure used ALL to ignore existing filters (explicitly for TabPLGLItem[GLItem] and implicitly for TabPLGLItem[Index]), so ALL should be used when specifying the Relation argument as well.

Regards,

Owen


Owen Auger
Did I answer your question? Mark my post as a solution!
Blog
Twitter
LinkedIn

View solution in original post

5 REPLIES 5
Ackbar-Learner
Resolver I
Resolver I

@tamerj1 @OwenAuger 

 

Both your solutions worked except that there is one limitation with the window function. Doing a running total with data from Direct Query using a window function is limited to 1million rows

 

AckbarLearner_0-1674374669705.png

I did the same running total using the previous way and it worked.

 

AckbarLearner_1-1674375297646.png

This seems weird though 🤔 as I kept everything the same and only changed the running total dax code. I guess the workings of the window function is pretty different at the back. Let me know if you have any workaround for this.

 

Thanks 

 

 

tamerj1
Super User
Super User

Hi @Ackbar-Learner 

You nned to have an item index column. please try

Board02aP&LRunningTotal =
SUMX (
WINDOW (
0,
ABS,
0,
REL,
SUMMARIZE (
ALLSELECTED ( TabPLGLItem ),
TabPLGLItem[GLItem],
TabPLGLItem[ItemIndex]
),
ORDERBY ( TabPLGLItem[ItemIndex] )
),
[Board01P&LAllTransactionAmountwithSign]
)

OwenAuger
Super User
Super User

Hi @Ackbar-Learner 

 

To replicate the behaviour of your original measure using the WINDOW function, a measure like this should work:

Board02aP&LRunningTotal =
CALCULATE (
    [Board01P&LAllTransactionAmountwithSign],
    WINDOW (
        0, ABS,
        0, REL,
        ALL ( TabPLGLItem[GLItem], TabPLGLItem[Index] ),
        ORDERBY ( TabPLGLItem[Index] )
    )
)

Does this work as intended?

 

Explanation:

  • In order to order by TabPLGLItem[Index] for the running total, you must include TabPLGLItem[Index] in the Relation argument of WINDOW, and provide TabPLGLItem[Index] as the argument of ORDERBY.
  • Your original measure used ALL to ignore existing filters (explicitly for TabPLGLItem[GLItem] and implicitly for TabPLGLItem[Index]), so ALL should be used when specifying the Relation argument as well.

Regards,

Owen


Owen Auger
Did I answer your question? Mark my post as a solution!
Blog
Twitter
LinkedIn

Superb! It worked. Thanks.

 

Does the window function work with text or we should still keep an index column?

Great! 🙂

In order to specify the sort order of a text column (by anything other than its natural sort order), yes, you would need to keep the index column, and specify it as the argument of ORDERBY.


Owen Auger
Did I answer your question? Mark my post as a solution!
Blog
Twitter
LinkedIn

Helpful resources

Announcements
Feb2025 Sticker Challenge

Join our Community Sticker Challenge 2025

If you love stickers, then you will definitely want to check out our Community Sticker Challenge!

Jan NL Carousel

Fabric Community Update - January 2025

Find out what's new and trending in the Fabric community.

Top Solution Authors