Join us at FabCon Atlanta from March 16 - 20, 2026, for the ultimate Fabric, Power BI, AI and SQL community-led event. Save $200 with code FABCOMM.
Register now!The Power BI Data Visualization World Championships is back! Get ahead of the game and start preparing now! Learn more
Hello,
I hve simple table like here:
EmployeeID Name ManagerID
| 1 | Alice | NULL |
| 2 | Bob | 1 |
| 3 | Carol | 1 |
| 4 | Dave | 2 |
| 5 | Eve | 2 |
| 6 | Frank | 3 |
and want to add hierarchy levels in power query, can anybody help with code?
I know that in DAX you can use path item but really I do not want to use it. It is calculated column, prefer to use source data.
Best,
Jacek
Solved! Go to Solution.
Hi @jaryszek ,
Looking at the solutions provided, both approaches will work, but let me address the performance question about List.PositionOf:
About List.PositionOf vs Table.SelectRows: You're right that List.PositionOf can be faster, but it depends on your data structure. Here's a hybrid approach that combines the best of both:
// First, create lookup lists for better performance
let
Source = your_table,
EmployeeIDs = Source[EmployeeID],
ManagerIDs = Source[ManagerID],
// Add hierarchy level using list lookup
GetLevel = (empID as number) as number =>
let
GetLevelRecursive = (currentID, level) =>
let
position = List.PositionOf(EmployeeIDs, currentID),
managerID = if position = -1 then null else ManagerIDs{position}
in
if managerID = null then level
else @GetLevelRecursive(managerID, level + 1)
in
GetLevelRecursive(empID, 0),
Result = Table.AddColumn(Source, "Level", each GetLevel([EmployeeID]))
in
ResultPerformance comparison:
For your case: If you have under 10,000 employees, the performance difference won't be noticeable. Table.SelectRows is probably fine and more maintainable.
If performance is critical: Use the list-based approach above - it creates the lookup lists once and reuses them.
The recursive solutions provided by @jaineshp are solid. The List.Generate approach is particularly good for avoiding infinite loops if you have data quality issues.
If my response resolved your query, kindly mark it as the Accepted Solution to assist others. Additionally, I would be grateful for a 'Kudos' if you found my response helpful.
This response was assisted by AI for translation and formatting purposes.
Hi @jaryszek ,
Looking at the solutions provided, both approaches will work, but let me address the performance question about List.PositionOf:
About List.PositionOf vs Table.SelectRows: You're right that List.PositionOf can be faster, but it depends on your data structure. Here's a hybrid approach that combines the best of both:
// First, create lookup lists for better performance
let
Source = your_table,
EmployeeIDs = Source[EmployeeID],
ManagerIDs = Source[ManagerID],
// Add hierarchy level using list lookup
GetLevel = (empID as number) as number =>
let
GetLevelRecursive = (currentID, level) =>
let
position = List.PositionOf(EmployeeIDs, currentID),
managerID = if position = -1 then null else ManagerIDs{position}
in
if managerID = null then level
else @GetLevelRecursive(managerID, level + 1)
in
GetLevelRecursive(empID, 0),
Result = Table.AddColumn(Source, "Level", each GetLevel([EmployeeID]))
in
ResultPerformance comparison:
For your case: If you have under 10,000 employees, the performance difference won't be noticeable. Table.SelectRows is probably fine and more maintainable.
If performance is critical: Use the list-based approach above - it creates the lookup lists once and reuses them.
The recursive solutions provided by @jaineshp are solid. The List.Generate approach is particularly good for avoiding infinite loops if you have data quality issues.
If my response resolved your query, kindly mark it as the Accepted Solution to assist others. Additionally, I would be grateful for a 'Kudos' if you found my response helpful.
This response was assisted by AI for translation and formatting purposes.
Thank you for nice explanation!
Thank you.
What about List.PositionOf function.
It should be faster than selectRows from table?
What do you think?
Best,
Jacek
Hi @jaryszek,
Thank you for reaching out to the Microsoft fabric community forum.
Yes, List.PositionOf can be faster in some cases because it works directly on a list, while Table.SelectRows checks every row each time. So if your data is large, using a list or record-based lookup can give better performance.
You can try both and see which one runs faster in your case.
Best Regards,
Harshitha.
Hey @jaryszek ,
Looking at your table structure, you can create hierarchy levels in Power Query using a recursive approach. Here's a concise solution:
Step 1: Add Custom Column for Level:
= Table.AddColumn(#"Previous Step", "Level", each
let
GetLevel = (empID) =>
let
manager = try Table.SelectRows(#"Previous Step", (x) => x[EmployeeID] = empID){0}[ManagerID] otherwise null
in
if manager = null then 0
else @GetLevel(manager) + 1
in
GetLevel([EmployeeID])
)
Step 2: Add Full Path (Optional) If you want the complete hierarchy path:
= Table.AddColumn(#"Previous Step", "Level", each
List.Count(
List.Generate(
() => [ManagerID],
each _ <> null,
each try Table.SelectRows(#"Previous Step", (x) => x[EmployeeID] = _){0}[ManagerID] otherwise null
)
)
)
Expected Results:
The second method handles circular references better and is more performant with larger datasets. Both will give you the hierarchy levels you need without touching DAX.
Works much better than calculated columns for performance, especially with larger datasets.
Best Regards,
Jainesh Poojara | Power BI Developer
The Power BI Data Visualization World Championships is back! Get ahead of the game and start preparing now!
| User | Count |
|---|---|
| 19 | |
| 9 | |
| 8 | |
| 7 | |
| 6 |