Microsoft is giving away 50,000 FREE Microsoft Certification exam vouchers!
Enter the sweepstakes now!Prepping for a Fabric certification exam? Join us for a live prep session with exam experts to learn how to pass the exam. Register now.
I would appreciate some advice, if people could let me know what I did wrong here. I should also mention that the reason for doing this in the first place is that I need to show growers and their varieties, provided their total sum of each variety is greater than 1.0. So if a grower has 5 plots each with .5 area of PlantTypeA = include them all. If a grower has 2 plots with planttypeB, but their total sum is .8 - don't include this variety at all.
@Unicorn_Tech , Try like
SUMMARIZE(
filter(new_plotinformations,new_plotinformations[Grower],new_plotinformations[Plantation Status] = "Commercial"),new_plotinformations[_new_variety_id_value],new_plotinformations[Total Planted Ha Converted],new_plotinformations[_new_country_id_value],new_plotinformations[Plantation Status],new_plotinformations[statecode],new_plotinformations[_new_licensee_value],new_plotinformations[_new_company_id_value],new_plotinformations[Production Status]
)
Unfortunately this didn't work. "Too many arguments were passed to the FILTER function. The maximum argument count for the function is 2."
Is there an easier way to have a new table with Grower, Variety type, and the total sum across all plots? I added additional columns that I would need, and removing those extra columns didn't seem to make a difference.
Perhaps SUMMARIZE isn't correct here?
Check out the April 2025 Power BI update to learn about new features.
Explore and share Fabric Notebooks to boost Power BI insights in the new community notebooks gallery.
User | Count |
---|---|
72 | |
67 | |
67 | |
44 | |
42 |
User | Count |
---|---|
47 | |
38 | |
28 | |
27 | |
27 |