The ultimate Fabric, Power BI, SQL, and AI community-led learning event. Save €200 with code FABCOMM.
Get registeredEnhance your career with this limited time 50% discount on Fabric and Power BI exams. Ends August 31st. Request your voucher.
I would appreciate some advice, if people could let me know what I did wrong here. I should also mention that the reason for doing this in the first place is that I need to show growers and their varieties, provided their total sum of each variety is greater than 1.0. So if a grower has 5 plots each with .5 area of PlantTypeA = include them all. If a grower has 2 plots with planttypeB, but their total sum is .8 - don't include this variety at all.
@Unicorn_Tech , Try like
SUMMARIZE(
filter(new_plotinformations,new_plotinformations[Grower],new_plotinformations[Plantation Status] = "Commercial"),new_plotinformations[_new_variety_id_value],new_plotinformations[Total Planted Ha Converted],new_plotinformations[_new_country_id_value],new_plotinformations[Plantation Status],new_plotinformations[statecode],new_plotinformations[_new_licensee_value],new_plotinformations[_new_company_id_value],new_plotinformations[Production Status]
)
Unfortunately this didn't work. "Too many arguments were passed to the FILTER function. The maximum argument count for the function is 2."
Is there an easier way to have a new table with Grower, Variety type, and the total sum across all plots? I added additional columns that I would need, and removing those extra columns didn't seem to make a difference.
Perhaps SUMMARIZE isn't correct here?
User | Count |
---|---|
79 | |
73 | |
39 | |
30 | |
28 |
User | Count |
---|---|
108 | |
99 | |
55 | |
49 | |
45 |