Join us at FabCon Atlanta from March 16 - 20, 2026, for the ultimate Fabric, Power BI, AI and SQL community-led event. Save $200 with code FABCOMM.
Register now!To celebrate FabCon Vienna, we are offering 50% off select exams. Ends October 3rd. Request your discount now.
I would appreciate some advice, if people could let me know what I did wrong here. I should also mention that the reason for doing this in the first place is that I need to show growers and their varieties, provided their total sum of each variety is greater than 1.0. So if a grower has 5 plots each with .5 area of PlantTypeA = include them all. If a grower has 2 plots with planttypeB, but their total sum is .8 - don't include this variety at all.
@Unicorn_Tech , Try like
SUMMARIZE(
filter(new_plotinformations,new_plotinformations[Grower],new_plotinformations[Plantation Status] = "Commercial"),new_plotinformations[_new_variety_id_value],new_plotinformations[Total Planted Ha Converted],new_plotinformations[_new_country_id_value],new_plotinformations[Plantation Status],new_plotinformations[statecode],new_plotinformations[_new_licensee_value],new_plotinformations[_new_company_id_value],new_plotinformations[Production Status]
)
Unfortunately this didn't work. "Too many arguments were passed to the FILTER function. The maximum argument count for the function is 2."
Is there an easier way to have a new table with Grower, Variety type, and the total sum across all plots? I added additional columns that I would need, and removing those extra columns didn't seem to make a difference.
Perhaps SUMMARIZE isn't correct here?