This time we’re going bigger than ever. Fabric, Power BI, SQL, AI and more. We're covering it all. You won't want to miss it.
Learn moreLevel up your Power BI skills this month - build one visual each week and tell better stories with data! Get started
I would appreciate some advice, if people could let me know what I did wrong here. I should also mention that the reason for doing this in the first place is that I need to show growers and their varieties, provided their total sum of each variety is greater than 1.0. So if a grower has 5 plots each with .5 area of PlantTypeA = include them all. If a grower has 2 plots with planttypeB, but their total sum is .8 - don't include this variety at all.
@Unicorn_Tech , Try like
SUMMARIZE(
filter(new_plotinformations,new_plotinformations[Grower],new_plotinformations[Plantation Status] = "Commercial"),new_plotinformations[_new_variety_id_value],new_plotinformations[Total Planted Ha Converted],new_plotinformations[_new_country_id_value],new_plotinformations[Plantation Status],new_plotinformations[statecode],new_plotinformations[_new_licensee_value],new_plotinformations[_new_company_id_value],new_plotinformations[Production Status]
)
Unfortunately this didn't work. "Too many arguments were passed to the FILTER function. The maximum argument count for the function is 2."
Is there an easier way to have a new table with Grower, Variety type, and the total sum across all plots? I added additional columns that I would need, and removing those extra columns didn't seem to make a difference.
Perhaps SUMMARIZE isn't correct here?
Check out the April 2026 Power BI update to learn about new features.
Sign up to receive a private message when registration opens and key events begin.
If you have recently started exploring Fabric, we'd love to hear how it's going. Your feedback can help with product improvements.
| User | Count |
|---|---|
| 30 | |
| 24 | |
| 23 | |
| 17 | |
| 15 |
| User | Count |
|---|---|
| 61 | |
| 36 | |
| 29 | |
| 22 | |
| 21 |