Advance your Data & AI career with 50 days of live learning, dataviz contests, hands-on challenges, study groups & certifications and more!
Get registeredGet Fabric Certified for FREE during Fabric Data Days. Don't miss your chance! Request now
Dear All,
I have a table like this:
Importance | Description of Item | Category | Agegroup | Value |
0.9 | Test 1 | A | 18-25 | 0.85 |
0.85 | Test 2 | A | 18-25 | 0.90 |
0.81 | Test 3 | A | 18-25 | 0.65 |
0.79 | Test 4 | A | 18-25 | 0.95 |
0.6 | Test 5 | A | 18-25 | 0.99 |
0.85 | Test 2 | A | 35-59 | 0.84 |
0.5 | Test 3 | A | 35-59 | 0.99 |
0.4 | Test 1 | A | 35-59 | 0.64 |
0.35 | Test 5 | A | 35-59 | 0.54 |
0.33 | Test 4 | A | 35-59 | 0.85 |
Based on that I have two slicers:
Then I built a matrix table with “Description of Item” and “Value”.
My problem is: within the table, the “Description of Item”-field is ranked alpabetical-wise.
But I want to achieve a ranking based on the Importance value (top down), even if I don’t have that importance within in the table.
For example I want to achieve thise:
Slider Agegroup: 35-39, Slider Category: A
Item | Value |
Test 2 | 0.84 |
Test 3 | 0.99 |
Test 1 | 0.64 |
Test 5 | 0.54 |
Test 4 | 0.85 |
But I get this instead:
Item | Value |
Test 1 | 0.64 |
Test 2 | 0.84 |
Test 3 | 0.99 |
Test 4 | 0.85 |
Test 5 | 0.54 |
Any idea how to fix this???
Cheers,
chris
Solved! Go to Solution.
Hi @chrisHH,
It seems that you could create the table with the three columns and then Sort by the Importance value.
Then you could hide the importance value under Format.
Best Regards,
Cherry
Hi @chrisHH,
It seems that you could create the table with the three columns and then Sort by the Importance value.
Then you could hide the importance value under Format.
Best Regards,
Cherry
Advance your Data & AI career with 50 days of live learning, contests, hands-on challenges, study groups & certifications and more!
Check out the October 2025 Power BI update to learn about new features.