Join us at FabCon Atlanta from March 16 - 20, 2026, for the ultimate Fabric, Power BI, AI and SQL community-led event. Save $200 with code FABCOMM.
Register now!Calling all Data Engineers! Fabric Data Engineer (Exam DP-700) live sessions are back! Starting October 16th. Sign up.
Dear All,
I have a table like this:
Importance | Description of Item | Category | Agegroup | Value |
0.9 | Test 1 | A | 18-25 | 0.85 |
0.85 | Test 2 | A | 18-25 | 0.90 |
0.81 | Test 3 | A | 18-25 | 0.65 |
0.79 | Test 4 | A | 18-25 | 0.95 |
0.6 | Test 5 | A | 18-25 | 0.99 |
0.85 | Test 2 | A | 35-59 | 0.84 |
0.5 | Test 3 | A | 35-59 | 0.99 |
0.4 | Test 1 | A | 35-59 | 0.64 |
0.35 | Test 5 | A | 35-59 | 0.54 |
0.33 | Test 4 | A | 35-59 | 0.85 |
Based on that I have two slicers:
Then I built a matrix table with “Description of Item” and “Value”.
My problem is: within the table, the “Description of Item”-field is ranked alpabetical-wise.
But I want to achieve a ranking based on the Importance value (top down), even if I don’t have that importance within in the table.
For example I want to achieve thise:
Slider Agegroup: 35-39, Slider Category: A
Item | Value |
Test 2 | 0.84 |
Test 3 | 0.99 |
Test 1 | 0.64 |
Test 5 | 0.54 |
Test 4 | 0.85 |
But I get this instead:
Item | Value |
Test 1 | 0.64 |
Test 2 | 0.84 |
Test 3 | 0.99 |
Test 4 | 0.85 |
Test 5 | 0.54 |
Any idea how to fix this???
Cheers,
chris
Solved! Go to Solution.
Hi @chrisHH,
It seems that you could create the table with the three columns and then Sort by the Importance value.
Then you could hide the importance value under Format.
Best Regards,
Cherry
Hi @chrisHH,
It seems that you could create the table with the three columns and then Sort by the Importance value.
Then you could hide the importance value under Format.
Best Regards,
Cherry
Join the Fabric FabCon Global Hackathon—running virtually through Nov 3. Open to all skill levels. $10,000 in prizes!
Check out the October 2025 Power BI update to learn about new features.