Join us at FabCon Atlanta from March 16 - 20, 2026, for the ultimate Fabric, Power BI, AI and SQL community-led event. Save $200 with code FABCOMM.
Register now!The Power BI Data Visualization World Championships is back! It's time to submit your entry. Live now!
Hi experts,
I am trying to sum Quantity by GroupName in the following relationship scenario. Tables are related via the same name fields.
This is simplified part of a much more complicated relationship scheme in which I can not have active relationships between these three tables. However, I read that one can use nested USERELATIONSHIP instructions. How do I do that?
Thank you.
Solved! Go to Solution.
Hi @gvg
From the tables/relationships you've shown, you should just activate the two relationships simultaneously.
The measure should look something like:
=
CALCULATE (
SUM ( Sales[Quantity] ),
USERELATIONSHIP ( Sales[Product], Subgroup[Product] ),
USERELATIONSHIP ( Subgroup[SubgroupName], Group[SubgroupName] )
)
You can also use the CROSSFILTER function with the same effect:
=
CALCULATE (
SUM ( Sales[Quantity] ),
CROSSFILTER ( Sales[Product], Subgroup[Product], OneWay ),
CROSSFILTER ( Subgroup[SubgroupName], Group[SubgroupName], OneWay )
)Owen 🙂
Hi @gvg
From the tables/relationships you've shown, you should just activate the two relationships simultaneously.
The measure should look something like:
=
CALCULATE (
SUM ( Sales[Quantity] ),
USERELATIONSHIP ( Sales[Product], Subgroup[Product] ),
USERELATIONSHIP ( Subgroup[SubgroupName], Group[SubgroupName] )
)
You can also use the CROSSFILTER function with the same effect:
=
CALCULATE (
SUM ( Sales[Quantity] ),
CROSSFILTER ( Sales[Product], Subgroup[Product], OneWay ),
CROSSFILTER ( Subgroup[SubgroupName], Group[SubgroupName], OneWay )
)Owen 🙂
Thanks! It works. Except that Groups table name should be in quotes ('Groups') as it probably represents DAX keyword.
| User | Count |
|---|---|
| 53 | |
| 37 | |
| 31 | |
| 21 | |
| 19 |
| User | Count |
|---|---|
| 138 | |
| 102 | |
| 59 | |
| 36 | |
| 35 |