March 31 - April 2, 2025, in Las Vegas, Nevada. Use code MSCUST for a $150 discount! Early bird discount ends December 31.
Register NowBe one of the first to start using Fabric Databases. View on-demand sessions with database experts and the Microsoft product team to learn just how easy it is to get started. Watch now
Hi Community,
I am working on the sample below , the objective is to calculatd in new column the Sum of Amounts where ID < Current_ID, in the right side the result I am supposed to get:
Here is my Dax measure but it returns an empty column
Thank you in advance
Solved! Go to Solution.
Hello @Greg_Deckler
I confirm that the updated DAX returns the value taking into account only key1 while key 2 is excluded.
Once I expanded the Key2 data I got incorrect values:
So I tried to add key2 to the extent, even though I didn't get the right values
Measures
VAR currentID-MAX('DATA'[ID])
VAR key1 to MAX('DATA'[Key 1])
VAR Key2 MAX(DATA[Clave 2])
Return
SUMX(FILTER(ALL('DATA'),'DATA'[Key 1]-key1 && 'DATA'[Key 2]-Key2 &&'DATA'[ID]<currentID),'DATA'[Amount])
Thank you in advance
@DataVitalizer , new column
SUMX(FILTER('Table','Table'[ID]< earlier('Table'[ID])),'Table'[Amount])
new Measure
SUMX(FILTER(all('Table'),'Table'[ID]< max('Table'[ID])),'Table'[Amount])
Hi,
Thank you @Greg_Deckler , @amitchandak for your quick reply.
I've tried both suggested measures, here below what I got:
The returned values are different than the target, here i tried to clarify more the need:
Thank you in advance.
@DataVitalizer - I updated my post after I originally posted, please check again, I took Key1 into account.
Hello @Greg_Deckler
I confirm that the updated DAX returns the value taking into account only key1 while key 2 is excluded.
Once I expanded the Key2 data I got incorrect values:
So I tried to add key2 to the extent, even though I didn't get the right values
Measures
VAR currentID-MAX('DATA'[ID])
VAR key1 to MAX('DATA'[Key 1])
VAR Key2 MAX(DATA[Clave 2])
Return
SUMX(FILTER(ALL('DATA'),'DATA'[Key 1]-key1 && 'DATA'[Key 2]-Key2 &&'DATA'[ID]<currentID),'DATA'[Amount])
Thank you in advance
Hi Community,
Any suggestions to solve that issue ?
@Greg_Deckler , @amitchandak any updates 🙂
Thank you in advance
Hi @DataVitalizer ,
How about the result after you follow the suggestions mentioned in my original post?
Could you please provide more details or expected result about it If it doesn't meet your requirement?
If you've fixed the issue on your own please kindly share your solution. If the above posts help, please kindly mark it as a solution to help others find it more quickly.
Best regards,
Community Support Team _ zhenbw
If this post helps, then please consider Accept it as the solution to help the other members find it more quickly.
Hi @DataVitalizer ,
We can create a measure to meet your requirement.
Measure =
CALCULATE(SUM('Table'[Amount]),FILTER(ALLSELECTED('Table'),'Table'[Key 1]=MAX('Table'[Key 1]) && 'Table'[ID]<MAX('Table'[ID])))
If it doesn’t meet your requirement, could you please show the exact expected result based on the table that you have shared?
Best regards,
Community Support Team _ zhenbw
If this post helps, then please consider Accept it as the solution to help the other members find it more quickly.
BTW, pbix as attached.
Measure =
Var currentID=MAX('Table'[ID])
VAR key1 = MAX('Table'[Key1])
Return
SUMX(FILTER(ALL('Table'),'Table'[Key1]=key1 && 'Table'[ID]<currentID),'Table'[Amount])
March 31 - April 2, 2025, in Las Vegas, Nevada. Use code MSCUST for a $150 discount!
Your insights matter. That’s why we created a quick survey to learn about your experience finding answers to technical questions.
Arun Ulag shares exciting details about the Microsoft Fabric Conference 2025, which will be held in Las Vegas, NV.
User | Count |
---|---|
133 | |
90 | |
88 | |
64 | |
58 |
User | Count |
---|---|
203 | |
141 | |
107 | |
73 | |
70 |