Don't miss your chance to take the Fabric Data Engineer (DP-600) exam for FREE! Find out how by attending the DP-600 session on April 23rd (pacific time), live or on-demand.
Learn moreNext up in the FabCon + SQLCon recap series: The roadmap for Microsoft SQL and Maximizing Developer experiences in Fabric. All sessions are available on-demand after the live show. Register now
Hi Community,
I am working on the sample below , the objective is to calculatd in new column the Sum of Amounts where ID < Current_ID, in the right side the result I am supposed to get:
Here is my Dax measure but it returns an empty column
Thank you in advance
Solved! Go to Solution.
Hello @Greg_Deckler
I confirm that the updated DAX returns the value taking into account only key1 while key 2 is excluded.
Once I expanded the Key2 data I got incorrect values:
So I tried to add key2 to the extent, even though I didn't get the right values
Measures
VAR currentID-MAX('DATA'[ID])
VAR key1 to MAX('DATA'[Key 1])
VAR Key2 MAX(DATA[Clave 2])
Return
SUMX(FILTER(ALL('DATA'),'DATA'[Key 1]-key1 && 'DATA'[Key 2]-Key2 &&'DATA'[ID]<currentID),'DATA'[Amount])Thank you in advance
@DataVitalizer , new column
SUMX(FILTER('Table','Table'[ID]< earlier('Table'[ID])),'Table'[Amount])
new Measure
SUMX(FILTER(all('Table'),'Table'[ID]< max('Table'[ID])),'Table'[Amount])
Hi,
Thank you @Greg_Deckler , @amitchandak for your quick reply.
I've tried both suggested measures, here below what I got:
The returned values are different than the target, here i tried to clarify more the need:
Thank you in advance.
@DataVitalizer - I updated my post after I originally posted, please check again, I took Key1 into account.
Hello @Greg_Deckler
I confirm that the updated DAX returns the value taking into account only key1 while key 2 is excluded.
Once I expanded the Key2 data I got incorrect values:
So I tried to add key2 to the extent, even though I didn't get the right values
Measures
VAR currentID-MAX('DATA'[ID])
VAR key1 to MAX('DATA'[Key 1])
VAR Key2 MAX(DATA[Clave 2])
Return
SUMX(FILTER(ALL('DATA'),'DATA'[Key 1]-key1 && 'DATA'[Key 2]-Key2 &&'DATA'[ID]<currentID),'DATA'[Amount])Thank you in advance
Hi Community,
Any suggestions to solve that issue ?
@Greg_Deckler , @amitchandak any updates 🙂
Thank you in advance
Hi @DataVitalizer ,
How about the result after you follow the suggestions mentioned in my original post?
Could you please provide more details or expected result about it If it doesn't meet your requirement?
If you've fixed the issue on your own please kindly share your solution. If the above posts help, please kindly mark it as a solution to help others find it more quickly.
Best regards,
Community Support Team _ zhenbw
If this post helps, then please consider Accept it as the solution to help the other members find it more quickly.
Hi @DataVitalizer ,
We can create a measure to meet your requirement.
Measure =
CALCULATE(SUM('Table'[Amount]),FILTER(ALLSELECTED('Table'),'Table'[Key 1]=MAX('Table'[Key 1]) && 'Table'[ID]<MAX('Table'[ID])))
If it doesn’t meet your requirement, could you please show the exact expected result based on the table that you have shared?
Best regards,
Community Support Team _ zhenbw
If this post helps, then please consider Accept it as the solution to help the other members find it more quickly.
BTW, pbix as attached.
Measure =
Var currentID=MAX('Table'[ID])
VAR key1 = MAX('Table'[Key1])
Return
SUMX(FILTER(ALL('Table'),'Table'[Key1]=key1 && 'Table'[ID]<currentID),'Table'[Amount])
If you have recently started exploring Fabric, we'd love to hear how it's going. Your feedback can help with product improvements.
A new Power BI DataViz World Championship is coming this June! Don't miss out on submitting your entry.
| User | Count |
|---|---|
| 44 | |
| 43 | |
| 38 | |
| 19 | |
| 15 |
| User | Count |
|---|---|
| 68 | |
| 64 | |
| 31 | |
| 29 | |
| 24 |