Power BI is turning 10, and we’re marking the occasion with a special community challenge. Use your creativity to tell a story, uncover trends, or highlight something unexpected.
Get startedJoin us for an expert-led overview of the tools and concepts you'll need to become a Certified Power BI Data Analyst and pass exam PL-300. Register now.
The method I commonly use to create a dimension table seems to me to be process intensive. I'm wondering if there is a better technique. I'm still learning but quite ignorant as to what power query processes take up unecessary memory/processing time.
I am commonly using 2 or 3 related fact tables (100,000 to 300,000 rows of data) and create dimension tables by referencing the 2 or 3 queries that are retrieving the fact table data and removing duplicates of whatever dimension column I'm interested in. My thinking is that these some these dimension tables need to be dynamic based on the data so I can't create static dimension tables.
Is there a better way to accomplish this?
Solved! Go to Solution.
Thanks @Idrissshatila for the insight. Unfortunately I don't have access to that particular data.
Thanks @Idrissshatila for the insight. Unfortunately I don't have access to that particular data.
Hello @troyhimes ,
If you have access to the souce of the data and you can build the dimension tables there, then it would be a better option. like if the data is coming from a sql server, what you could do is build the dimension tables in sql as views and import them to power BI as seperate tables.
If you don't have access or its not possible to build it in the source then I would be building it the way you're doing it.
If I answered your question, please mark my post as solution, Appreciate your Kudos 👍
Proud to be a Super User! | |
This is your chance to engage directly with the engineering team behind Fabric and Power BI. Share your experiences and shape the future.
Check out the June 2025 Power BI update to learn about new features.
User | Count |
---|---|
72 | |
71 | |
57 | |
38 | |
36 |
User | Count |
---|---|
83 | |
67 | |
62 | |
46 | |
45 |