Don't miss your chance to take the Fabric Data Engineer (DP-700) exam on us!
Learn moreWe've captured the moments from FabCon & SQLCon that everyone is talking about, and we are bringing them to the community, live and on-demand. Starts on April 14th. Register now
Headcount = CALCULATE (DISTINCTCOUNT(Contracts[id]), FILTER (Contracts, Contracts[Start Date] <= CALCULATE(MAX (Calendar[Date]))), FILTER (Contracts, Contracts[End Date] >= CALCULATE(MIN(Calendar[Date]))))
I have this code in DAX for HeadCount. Works fine, but when you start selecting dimensions, there is a pause of 3-4 seconds before the result is shown. I wonder if doing this in M would be faster.
Anyone got an example of this?
How big is your contracts table? Filter on data tables can be slow. There is a better way - I know because Marco Russo challenged me with a homework question last week after I wrote this post. http://exceleratorbi.com.au/double-calculate-solves-sumx-problem/
I havent had a chance to sit and think it through, but note the comment from Andrey at the above post - that could be a better answer.
If you note a better result, please post back.
The table looks now like this:
id, startime, endtime
there are like 200.000 records. I guess it needs to be unpivot in some way. In did this with another bi tool, and it generated 40mil records. This was a record for each day for each id as long as it was running. But a month M-calculation will also be fine i guess.
I will test the Andrey code 🙂
If you have recently started exploring Fabric, we'd love to hear how it's going. Your feedback can help with product improvements.
A new Power BI DataViz World Championship is coming this June! Don't miss out on submitting your entry.
Share feedback directly with Fabric product managers, participate in targeted research studies and influence the Fabric roadmap.
| User | Count |
|---|---|
| 53 | |
| 37 | |
| 34 | |
| 19 | |
| 17 |
| User | Count |
|---|---|
| 72 | |
| 72 | |
| 38 | |
| 35 | |
| 26 |