Don't miss your chance to take the Fabric Data Engineer (DP-600) exam for FREE! Find out how by attending the DP-600 session on April 23rd (pacific time), live or on-demand.
Learn moreNext up in the FabCon + SQLCon recap series: The roadmap for Microsoft SQL and Maximizing Developer experiences in Fabric. All sessions are available on-demand after the live show. Register now
Headcount = CALCULATE (DISTINCTCOUNT(Contracts[id]), FILTER (Contracts, Contracts[Start Date] <= CALCULATE(MAX (Calendar[Date]))), FILTER (Contracts, Contracts[End Date] >= CALCULATE(MIN(Calendar[Date]))))
I have this code in DAX for HeadCount. Works fine, but when you start selecting dimensions, there is a pause of 3-4 seconds before the result is shown. I wonder if doing this in M would be faster.
Anyone got an example of this?
How big is your contracts table? Filter on data tables can be slow. There is a better way - I know because Marco Russo challenged me with a homework question last week after I wrote this post. http://exceleratorbi.com.au/double-calculate-solves-sumx-problem/
I havent had a chance to sit and think it through, but note the comment from Andrey at the above post - that could be a better answer.
If you note a better result, please post back.
The table looks now like this:
id, startime, endtime
there are like 200.000 records. I guess it needs to be unpivot in some way. In did this with another bi tool, and it generated 40mil records. This was a record for each day for each id as long as it was running. But a month M-calculation will also be fine i guess.
I will test the Andrey code 🙂
If you have recently started exploring Fabric, we'd love to hear how it's going. Your feedback can help with product improvements.
A new Power BI DataViz World Championship is coming this June! Don't miss out on submitting your entry.
| User | Count |
|---|---|
| 45 | |
| 43 | |
| 39 | |
| 19 | |
| 15 |
| User | Count |
|---|---|
| 67 | |
| 66 | |
| 31 | |
| 28 | |
| 24 |