Skip to main content
cancel
Showing results for 
Search instead for 
Did you mean: 

Register now to learn Fabric in free live sessions led by the best Microsoft experts. From Apr 16 to May 9, in English and Spanish.

Reply
adunn
Helper I
Helper I

Direct Query Table Relationship Not Functioning As Expected

I am trying to recreate some data I had been able to extract in Import mode, but instead using Direct Queries.

In this instance, I have two tables containing hopefully unique values. Currently, they are showing up as a One-To-Many relationship in Power BI (I am uncertain if this is the cause of my problem).

Essentially, I want to see if a unique ID is in Table 1 and in Table 2 (it is not guaranteed to be in both). I have filtered both data sources and given them a relationship. However, when writing measures and attempting to filter only to rows where the unique ID exists in both tables, it still gives me every row in Table 1, even ones without a match in Table 2. I have checked both tables and there definitely is not a match.

 

This is my DAX formula:

WO's in Engineering and IMOS = CALCULATE(DISTINCTCOUNT('TRADESOFT - WO'[WoNbr]),'TRADESOFT - WO'[WorkOrdStatusNbr] = 1, 'TRADESOFT - WO'[WorkOrdTypeNbr] = 2, 'TRADESOFT - JOBS'[JobStatusNbr] = 2, ISBLANK('IMOS - PROADMIN'[WoNbr]) = FALSE())
 
'TRADESOFT - WO' is Table 1 and 'IMOS - PROADMIN' is Table 2. They have a One-to-Many relationship WoNbr, and I thought this formula would give me rows where a WoNbr existed in Table 1 and in Table 2. Instead it gives me rows for WoNbrs that are not in Table 2.
1 ACCEPTED SOLUTION
v-xicai
Community Support
Community Support

Hi @adunn ,

 

You may change the formula like DAX below, and make sure the Cross filter direction of relationship between the two tables as Both.

 

WO's in Engineering and IMOS =
CALCULATE (
    DISTINCTCOUNT ( 'TRADESOFT - WO'[WoNbr] ),
    FILTER (
        'TRADESOFT - WO',
        'TRADESOFT - WO'[WorkOrdStatusNbr] = 1
            && 'TRADESOFT - WO'[WorkOrdTypeNbr] = 2
    ),
    FILTER ( 'TRADESOFT - JOBS', 'TRADESOFT - JOBS'[JobStatusNbr] = 2 ),
    FILTER (
        'IMOS - PROADMIN',
        ISBLANK ( 'IMOS - PROADMIN'[WoNbr] ) = FALSE ()
            && 'IMOS - PROADMIN'[WoNbr] = RELATED ( 'TRADESOFT - WO'[WoNbr] )
    )
)

 

Best Regards,

Amy 

 

Community Support Team _ Amy

If this post helps, then please consider Accept it as the solution to help the other members find it more quickly.

View solution in original post

1 REPLY 1
v-xicai
Community Support
Community Support

Hi @adunn ,

 

You may change the formula like DAX below, and make sure the Cross filter direction of relationship between the two tables as Both.

 

WO's in Engineering and IMOS =
CALCULATE (
    DISTINCTCOUNT ( 'TRADESOFT - WO'[WoNbr] ),
    FILTER (
        'TRADESOFT - WO',
        'TRADESOFT - WO'[WorkOrdStatusNbr] = 1
            && 'TRADESOFT - WO'[WorkOrdTypeNbr] = 2
    ),
    FILTER ( 'TRADESOFT - JOBS', 'TRADESOFT - JOBS'[JobStatusNbr] = 2 ),
    FILTER (
        'IMOS - PROADMIN',
        ISBLANK ( 'IMOS - PROADMIN'[WoNbr] ) = FALSE ()
            && 'IMOS - PROADMIN'[WoNbr] = RELATED ( 'TRADESOFT - WO'[WoNbr] )
    )
)

 

Best Regards,

Amy 

 

Community Support Team _ Amy

If this post helps, then please consider Accept it as the solution to help the other members find it more quickly.

Helpful resources

Announcements
Microsoft Fabric Learn Together

Microsoft Fabric Learn Together

Covering the world! 9:00-10:30 AM Sydney, 4:00-5:30 PM CET (Paris/Berlin), 7:00-8:30 PM Mexico City

PBI_APRIL_CAROUSEL1

Power BI Monthly Update - April 2024

Check out the April 2024 Power BI update to learn about new features.

April Fabric Community Update

Fabric Community Update - April 2024

Find out what's new and trending in the Fabric Community.