Starting December 3, join live sessions with database experts and the Microsoft product team to learn just how easy it is to get started
Learn moreShape the future of the Fabric Community! Your insights matter. That’s why we created a quick survey to learn about your experience finding answers to technical questions. Take survey.
Hello,
Basically, I have one table with data zones and beneath them postcodes (multiple postcodes make up data zones). In another table, I have rows of sales details, which include postcodes. So, I can quite easily work out how many sales I have per data zone. My issue is I would like to know what the distribution of these sales are, and whether, say, 5% of datazones contribute 25% of sales.
My idea for doing this was to have a cumulative sum of sales, by datazone. So for example, if we had the following data (remembering that this is taken from two separate tables):
Data zone Sales
DZ1 1
DZ2 2
DZ3 1
DZ4 4
Then I would like to see it sorted and counted like this:
Data zone Cumulative total
DZ1 1
DZ3 2
DZ2 4
DZ4 8
However, when I have tried to do this, it has just sorted it by datazone, not number of sales-per-datazone, so I get this:
Data zone Cumulative total
DZ1 1
DZ2 3
DZ3 4
DZ4 8
Has anyone come across this problem before? I know how I would do it in Excel but I can't seem to figure it out! Let me know if you need any further info
Hi @HarryS ,
We can create a measure and sort by it to meet your requirement:
Cumulative total =
CALCULATE (
SUM ( 'Table'[Sales] ),
FILTER (
ALLSELECTED ( 'Table' ),
'Table'[Sales] < MIN ( 'Table'[Sales] )
|| ( 'Table'[Data zone] <= MIN ( 'Table'[Data zone] ) && 'Table'[Sales] = MIN ( 'Table'[Sales] ))
)
)
Best regards,
Hello,
Thanks for your replies. Unfortunately I still can't seem to get it to work. I have solved the two tables problem by going back into Excel and creating a lookup column. I think part of the issue is probably that I presented an overly simplified account of my data. The relevant columns are as follows
Datazone Value
1 1
2 0
2 0
3 1
4 1
5 0
6 0
3 1
1 1
3 0
And so on. I would like to arrange the above table (on a much larger scale), in a cumulative total, ordered by total value, rather than Datazone number. Everything I have tried so far either keeps the Datazone number as the order and does a cumulative total based on that, or gives me wildly inflated figures.
Again, thanks for taking the time to reply and help me with this, I do appreciate it!
Hi @HarryS
this sounds like an ABC-classification: https://www.daxpatterns.com/abc-classification/
Imke Feldmann (The BIccountant)
If you liked my solution, please give it a thumbs up. And if I did answer your question, please mark this post as a solution. Thanks!
How to integrate M-code into your solution -- How to get your questions answered quickly -- How to provide sample data -- Check out more PBI- learning resources here -- Performance Tipps for M-queries
Your insights matter. That’s why we created a quick survey to learn about your experience finding answers to technical questions.
User | Count |
---|---|
92 | |
92 | |
84 | |
80 | |
49 |
User | Count |
---|---|
146 | |
137 | |
109 | |
68 | |
55 |