Get certified for free when you join Fabric Data Days 2026 and dive into Fabric, Power BI, SQL, AI, and other essential data skills.
Join nowJuly 7 - July 17 | Round 2 of the Power BI Dataviz World Championships. Don't miss your chance! Learn more
@o59393 Well, you have a weak many-to-many relationship between the two tables involved and that's probably a starting point for what is going wrong.
Hi @Greg_Deckler !
Yes I know M:M is not recommeneded, however is the only way I can treat my model because it has multiple SKU's, which then I cluster them by categories.
The source files inevitably lead me to make a M:M relationship.
If you could find a turnaroud to my calculated column I would appreaciate 🙂
Thanks.
Join us in Barcelona for FabCon and SQLCon, the Fabric, Power BI, SQL, and AI community event. Save €200 with code FABCMTY200.
Join Fabric Data Days 2026: 60 days of free live/on-demand sessions, challenges, study groups, and certification opportunities.
| User | Count |
|---|---|
| 22 | |
| 18 | |
| 18 | |
| 17 | |
| 13 |
| User | Count |
|---|---|
| 61 | |
| 53 | |
| 47 | |
| 40 | |
| 38 |