We've captured the moments from FabCon & SQLCon that everyone is talking about, and we are bringing them to the community, live and on-demand. Starts on April 14th. Register now
@o59393 Well, you have a weak many-to-many relationship between the two tables involved and that's probably a starting point for what is going wrong.
Hi @Greg_Deckler !
Yes I know M:M is not recommeneded, however is the only way I can treat my model because it has multiple SKU's, which then I cluster them by categories.
The source files inevitably lead me to make a M:M relationship.
If you could find a turnaroud to my calculated column I would appreaciate 🙂
Thanks.
If you have recently started exploring Fabric, we'd love to hear how it's going. Your feedback can help with product improvements.
A new Power BI DataViz World Championship is coming this June! Don't miss out on submitting your entry.
Share feedback directly with Fabric product managers, participate in targeted research studies and influence the Fabric roadmap.
| User | Count |
|---|---|
| 53 | |
| 38 | |
| 33 | |
| 16 | |
| 15 |
| User | Count |
|---|---|
| 66 | |
| 63 | |
| 37 | |
| 34 | |
| 22 |