Power BI is turning 10, and we’re marking the occasion with a special community challenge. Use your creativity to tell a story, uncover trends, or highlight something unexpected.
Get startedJoin us for an expert-led overview of the tools and concepts you'll need to become a Certified Power BI Data Analyst and pass exam PL-300. Register now.
hello, I'm trying to create a calculated table with data from one that doesn't have the other. I am doing
Calculatetable ( FILTER (F_TABLE_1 , NOT CONTAINS (F_TABLE_2 , F_TABLE_2 [costumer_2 ] , F_TABLE_1 [costumer_1] , F_TABLE_2 [cod_2 ] , F_TABLE_1 [cod_1] )
this works, but first I want it to validate if the id of one is greater than the other I tried to do that
switch (TRUE () , FILTER ( F_TABLE_2 , F_TABLE_2 [ID_costumer_2 ]) > FILTER ( F_TABLE_1 , F_TABLE_1 [ID_costumer_1]) , Calculatetable ( FILTER (F_TABLE_1 , NOT CONTAINS (F_TABLE_2 , F_TABLE_2 [costumer_2 ] , F_TABLE_1 [costumer_1] , F_TABLE_2 [cod_2 ] , F_TABLE_1 [cod_1] )
but that doesn't work, I want it to first validate if the customer id of f_table_2 is greater than the id_customer of f_table_1 and then do the other validations
att:
the customer id is the joining of the date in numeric format and a few more digits. With each passing day that number increases.
Hi
You can use EXCEPT.
Example:
This is your chance to engage directly with the engineering team behind Fabric and Power BI. Share your experiences and shape the future.
Check out the June 2025 Power BI update to learn about new features.
User | Count |
---|---|
10 | |
9 | |
9 | |
8 | |
8 |
User | Count |
---|---|
14 | |
12 | |
11 | |
11 | |
8 |