Join us at FabCon Atlanta from March 16 - 20, 2026, for the ultimate Fabric, Power BI, AI and SQL community-led event. Save $200 with code FABCOMM.
Register now!The Power BI Data Visualization World Championships is back! Get ahead of the game and start preparing now! Learn more
hello, I'm trying to create a calculated table with data from one that doesn't have the other. I am doing
Calculatetable ( FILTER (F_TABLE_1 , NOT CONTAINS (F_TABLE_2 , F_TABLE_2 [costumer_2 ] , F_TABLE_1 [costumer_1] , F_TABLE_2 [cod_2 ] , F_TABLE_1 [cod_1] )
this works, but first I want it to validate if the id of one is greater than the other I tried to do that
switch (TRUE () , FILTER ( F_TABLE_2 , F_TABLE_2 [ID_costumer_2 ]) > FILTER ( F_TABLE_1 , F_TABLE_1 [ID_costumer_1]) , Calculatetable ( FILTER (F_TABLE_1 , NOT CONTAINS (F_TABLE_2 , F_TABLE_2 [costumer_2 ] , F_TABLE_1 [costumer_1] , F_TABLE_2 [cod_2 ] , F_TABLE_1 [cod_1] )
but that doesn't work, I want it to first validate if the customer id of f_table_2 is greater than the id_customer of f_table_1 and then do the other validations
att:
the customer id is the joining of the date in numeric format and a few more digits. With each passing day that number increases.
Hi
You can use EXCEPT.
Example:
The Power BI Data Visualization World Championships is back! Get ahead of the game and start preparing now!
Check out the November 2025 Power BI update to learn about new features.
| User | Count |
|---|---|
| 19 | |
| 10 | |
| 9 | |
| 4 | |
| 4 |
| User | Count |
|---|---|
| 34 | |
| 32 | |
| 20 | |
| 12 | |
| 11 |