Skip to main content
cancel
Showing results for 
Search instead for 
Did you mean: 

Join the Fabric FabCon Global Hackathon—running virtually through Nov 3. Open to all skill levels. $10,000 in prizes! Register now.

Reply
Salle
Advocate I
Advocate I

Inaccurate Cumulative Sum

Hi, having trouble getting the cumulative sum accurate. Filter issue?

 

Setup:
Two tables: 'Rerun'[RejectCodeID];[Units]  and 'Scrap'[RejectCodeID]; [Units].

One to many: Dimension table 'RejectCode'[RejectCodeID]

The Dax measure I use calculates the cumulative sum of rejects incorrectly after 116.
It sould been 35, 57, 77, 93, 105, 117, 118, 119, 120, 121, 122.

Salle_0-1698668522477.png

Cumulative Rejects = 

VAR TotalRejects = [Reruns] + [Scrap]

Return

SUMX(
    FILTER(
        SUMMARIZE( ALLSELECTED('RejectCode'), 'RejectCode'[RejectCodeID], 
        "Rejects", [Scrap] + [Reruns] ),
         [Rejects] >= TotalRejects ),
         [Rejects] )

Any ideas on what can be wrong?


Thanks! 

1 ACCEPTED SOLUTION
Anonymous
Not applicable

Hi @Salle ,

 

I'm suspecting you're trying to accumulate based on total largest to smallest, and you can check the results as follows:

vtianyichmsft_0-1698827420910.png

Rank = 
VAR _1=RANKX('Table (2)','Table (2)'[Total],,DESC,Dense) 

VAR _2 =
RANKX('Table (2)','Table (2)'[RejectCodeID],,ASC,Dense)/ POWER(10,ROUNDDOWN(COUNT('Table (2)'[RejectCodeID])/10,0)+1)
RETURN
_1 + _2

Cumulative Rejects = 
VAR TotalRejects = [Re] + [Sc]
Return
CALCULATE(
    SUM('Table (2)'[Total]),
    FILTER(
        ALLSELECTED('Table (2)'),
        'Table (2)'[Rank] <= MAX('Table (2)'[Rank])
    )
)

 

An attachment for your reference. Hope it helps!

 

Best regards,
Community Support Team_ Scott Chang

 

If this post helps then please consider Accept it as the solution to help the other members find it more quickly.

View solution in original post

3 REPLIES 3
Anonymous
Not applicable

Hi @Salle ,

 

I'm suspecting you're trying to accumulate based on total largest to smallest, and you can check the results as follows:

vtianyichmsft_0-1698827420910.png

Rank = 
VAR _1=RANKX('Table (2)','Table (2)'[Total],,DESC,Dense) 

VAR _2 =
RANKX('Table (2)','Table (2)'[RejectCodeID],,ASC,Dense)/ POWER(10,ROUNDDOWN(COUNT('Table (2)'[RejectCodeID])/10,0)+1)
RETURN
_1 + _2

Cumulative Rejects = 
VAR TotalRejects = [Re] + [Sc]
Return
CALCULATE(
    SUM('Table (2)'[Total]),
    FILTER(
        ALLSELECTED('Table (2)'),
        'Table (2)'[Rank] <= MAX('Table (2)'[Rank])
    )
)

 

An attachment for your reference. Hope it helps!

 

Best regards,
Community Support Team_ Scott Chang

 

If this post helps then please consider Accept it as the solution to help the other members find it more quickly.

Thennarasu_R
Responsive Resident
Responsive Resident

Hi @Salle 

Try this measure ,

Measure=Calculate (Rejects+Scraps,Filter(All(Dimdate),Date column<=Max(Date))

Thanks,
Thennarasu R
If this post helps then please consider accepeted the solution  to help the other members find it more quickly. 


It does not work.
I want to plot a pareto chart with RejectionCodeID as bars and Pareto curve as line. But first the cumulative sum must be accurate.

Helpful resources

Announcements
September Power BI Update Carousel

Power BI Monthly Update - September 2025

Check out the September 2025 Power BI update to learn about new features.

FabCon Atlanta 2026 carousel

FabCon Atlanta 2026

Join us at FabCon Atlanta, March 16-20, for the ultimate Fabric, Power BI, AI and SQL community-led event. Save $200 with code FABCOMM.