Check your eligibility for this 50% exam voucher offer and join us for free live learning sessions to get prepared for Exam DP-700.
Get StartedDon't miss out! 2025 Microsoft Fabric Community Conference, March 31 - April 2, Las Vegas, Nevada. Use code MSCUST for a $150 discount. Prices go up February 11th. Register now.
Hi,
Being a new bie to PBI Need help to arrive at correct measure to take in to account the bridging table .
Recreated my actual case with simple sample data.
Two fact tables,Three dim tables and a Bridge table.
Bridge table has n to 1 relationship as well as 1 to n relation ship between ID1 and ID2
My current measure does not take in to account the relation ship while calculation as it still calculates the values for independent IDs and not taking the ID mapping to account. Expected correct values given in red after aggregation.
https://drive.google.com/file/d/1NwijYKBDzng82mm6jXpthB8SkWAG1OJo/view?usp=drive_link
Enclosing the PBIX sample file.
Deeply appreciate your support.
Thanks.
Solved! Go to Solution.
Yeah, sort of. The good thing about TREATAS is that it works (better) without joins.
@lbendlin
Request to confirm whether the below approach is right in current context
Energy_per_cum(Rev1) =
CALCULATE(
VAR Units =
CALCULATE(
[Energy (Units)],
TREATAS(
SUMMARIZE(
Bridge_Table,Bridge_Table[ID1]),
Fact_Table1[ID1])
)
VAR Flow_cum =
CALCULATE(
[Flow (Ltrs)],
TREATAS(
SUMMARIZE(
Bridge_Table,Bridge_Table[ID2]),
Fact_Table2[ID2]
)
)
VAR Units_per_Cum = DIVIDE(Units,Flow_cum)
RETURN Units_per_Cum
)
Yeah, sort of. The good thing about TREATAS is that it works (better) without joins.
Are you familiar with the TREATAS function?
@lbendlin -Sorry i need to explore. If you can suggest that measure,will be of great help. Thank u for your response
User | Count |
---|---|
22 | |
14 | |
11 | |
7 | |
5 |
User | Count |
---|---|
24 | |
22 | |
20 | |
15 | |
10 |