Forum Discussion
Discrepancy in CU Consumption Between Fabric Capacity Metrics and Fabric Chargeback Reporting
Hello,
I’ve encountered a discrepancy in the reported Capacity Unit (CU) consumption between two official Microsoft reports: Fabric Capacity Metrics and Fabric Chargeback Reporting.
In both reports, I apply only a basic filter for a full day — specifically looking at data from 7 days ago. Since I’m working with historical data, I assume that delayed refreshes or similar timing issues should not be a factor. There are no additional filters or data limitations applied, yet the Sum of CU values differ between the two reports.
Has anyone else noticed this difference?What could be the reason behind such a discrepancy? Which of the two reports is considered more accurate or reliable for tracking CU usage?
Thank you in advance for any insights or experiences you can share.
- Anonymous1 year ago
Hi MorelG ,
Thank you for the prompt response GilbertQ and lbendlin !
As per my investigation,the Capacity Metrics app gives the most detailed view of CU usage for monitoring and troubleshooting, while the Chargeback app is meant for daily cost tracking by workspace or user. Differences in totals are expected due to how data is aggregated (real-time vs daily) and some known telemetry issues. For the most accurate insights, use Capacity Metrics for operations and Chargeback for billing, and check Timepoint Details in Capacity Metrics for deeper analysis.Refer the link here:
https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/fabric/enterprise/metrics-app
https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/fabric/enterprise/chargeback-app
Hope this helps.
Thank you.
Regards,
Pallavi.
3 Replies
- lbendlinSuper User
Oh, we see the issues with that app every single day. Did you know they have a 100K operations limit per 30 second timeslot? Guess what, our capacities easily exceed that, resulting in us flying blind for x percent of our operations. And don't get me started on the latency and batching issues.
- AnonymousNot applicable
Hi MorelG ,
Thank you for the prompt response GilbertQ and lbendlin !
As per my investigation,the Capacity Metrics app gives the most detailed view of CU usage for monitoring and troubleshooting, while the Chargeback app is meant for daily cost tracking by workspace or user. Differences in totals are expected due to how data is aggregated (real-time vs daily) and some known telemetry issues. For the most accurate insights, use Capacity Metrics for operations and Chargeback for billing, and check Timepoint Details in Capacity Metrics for deeper analysis.Refer the link here:
https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/fabric/enterprise/metrics-app
https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/fabric/enterprise/chargeback-app
Hope this helps.
Thank you.
Regards,
Pallavi.