Skip to main content
cancel
Showing results for 
Search instead for 
Did you mean: 

Learn from the best! Meet the four finalists headed to the FINALS of the Power BI Dataviz World Championships! Register now

Reply
Dicken
Continued Contributor
Continued Contributor

Function within List.Generate

Hi, 

I have to grouped accumulations ; 
A ; which does not work ; 
= Table.Group(Source, {"Name", "Item"},
                      {{"Count", each
                             List.Generate( ()=> [ x = 0 , y = [Unit] {0} ] ,
                                                  each [x] < List.Count( [Unit] ) ,
                                                    each [ x = 0 , y = [y] + [Unit] {x} ] ,
                                                   each [y] )
                                    }  } )

and B; which does; 
Table.Group(Source, {"Name", "Item"}, {{"Count", (i)=>
                                                            List.Generate( ()=> [ x = 0 , y = i[Unit] {0} ],
                                                                                 each [x] < List.Count( i [Unit] ) ,
                                                                                 each [ x = [x] + 1, y = [y] + i [Unit] {x} ] ,
                                                                               each [y] )
                                                                       }} )
As can be seen if defined the  function (i)=> in the second, so is the first refering to an 'outside' table, while the 'each' in 
generate is specifically whats going on within the List.Generate , so where both are each it gets confused and causes an error 
or something like that ? 

  Rchard. 

2 ACCEPTED SOLUTIONS
ronrsnfld
Super User
Super User

You have it correct.

View solution in original post

ZhangKun
Super User
Super User

The each keyword is a syntax sugar, which is a shorthand form of "(_) =>". In the first case, only the each keyword is used. The program will find whether there is a Unit column in the variable (identifier) ​​named "_" in the nearest layer.

The key point is:

  • The function in the first parameter has no parameters, so the Unit column can be found (there is no variable named _ at the current level, so it will be looked for outside).
  • The next three parameters all use the each keyword, which uses _ as the name, so [Unit] in them cannot find the Unit column (looking for the nearest variable named _).

    ZhangKun_0-1745086798620.png

View solution in original post

3 REPLIES 3
ZhangKun
Super User
Super User

The each keyword is a syntax sugar, which is a shorthand form of "(_) =>". In the first case, only the each keyword is used. The program will find whether there is a Unit column in the variable (identifier) ​​named "_" in the nearest layer.

The key point is:

  • The function in the first parameter has no parameters, so the Unit column can be found (there is no variable named _ at the current level, so it will be looked for outside).
  • The next three parameters all use the each keyword, which uses _ as the name, so [Unit] in them cannot find the Unit column (looking for the nearest variable named _).

    ZhangKun_0-1745086798620.png

ronrsnfld
Super User
Super User

You have it correct.

Dicken
Continued Contributor
Continued Contributor

Thanks, it took a while for the penny to drop when I kept getting an 
error, at first I used a let statement, and named the [Units]  and then I could use the name. 
in  generate. 

Helpful resources

Announcements
Join our Fabric User Panel

Join our Fabric User Panel

Share feedback directly with Fabric product managers, participate in targeted research studies and influence the Fabric roadmap.

February Power BI Update Carousel

Power BI Monthly Update - February 2026

Check out the February 2026 Power BI update to learn about new features.