Skip to main content
cancel
Showing results for 
Search instead for 
Did you mean: 

The Power BI Data Visualization World Championships is back! Get ahead of the game and start preparing now! Learn more

Reply
Dicken
Continued Contributor
Continued Contributor

Function within List.Generate

Hi, 

I have to grouped accumulations ; 
A ; which does not work ; 
= Table.Group(Source, {"Name", "Item"},
                      {{"Count", each
                             List.Generate( ()=> [ x = 0 , y = [Unit] {0} ] ,
                                                  each [x] < List.Count( [Unit] ) ,
                                                    each [ x = 0 , y = [y] + [Unit] {x} ] ,
                                                   each [y] )
                                    }  } )

and B; which does; 
Table.Group(Source, {"Name", "Item"}, {{"Count", (i)=>
                                                            List.Generate( ()=> [ x = 0 , y = i[Unit] {0} ],
                                                                                 each [x] < List.Count( i [Unit] ) ,
                                                                                 each [ x = [x] + 1, y = [y] + i [Unit] {x} ] ,
                                                                               each [y] )
                                                                       }} )
As can be seen if defined the  function (i)=> in the second, so is the first refering to an 'outside' table, while the 'each' in 
generate is specifically whats going on within the List.Generate , so where both are each it gets confused and causes an error 
or something like that ? 

  Rchard. 

2 ACCEPTED SOLUTIONS
ronrsnfld
Super User
Super User

You have it correct.

View solution in original post

ZhangKun
Super User
Super User

The each keyword is a syntax sugar, which is a shorthand form of "(_) =>". In the first case, only the each keyword is used. The program will find whether there is a Unit column in the variable (identifier) ​​named "_" in the nearest layer.

The key point is:

  • The function in the first parameter has no parameters, so the Unit column can be found (there is no variable named _ at the current level, so it will be looked for outside).
  • The next three parameters all use the each keyword, which uses _ as the name, so [Unit] in them cannot find the Unit column (looking for the nearest variable named _).

    ZhangKun_0-1745086798620.png

View solution in original post

3 REPLIES 3
ZhangKun
Super User
Super User

The each keyword is a syntax sugar, which is a shorthand form of "(_) =>". In the first case, only the each keyword is used. The program will find whether there is a Unit column in the variable (identifier) ​​named "_" in the nearest layer.

The key point is:

  • The function in the first parameter has no parameters, so the Unit column can be found (there is no variable named _ at the current level, so it will be looked for outside).
  • The next three parameters all use the each keyword, which uses _ as the name, so [Unit] in them cannot find the Unit column (looking for the nearest variable named _).

    ZhangKun_0-1745086798620.png

ronrsnfld
Super User
Super User

You have it correct.

Dicken
Continued Contributor
Continued Contributor

Thanks, it took a while for the penny to drop when I kept getting an 
error, at first I used a let statement, and named the [Units]  and then I could use the name. 
in  generate. 

Helpful resources

Announcements
Power BI DataViz World Championships

Power BI Dataviz World Championships

The Power BI Data Visualization World Championships is back! Get ahead of the game and start preparing now!

December 2025 Power BI Update Carousel

Power BI Monthly Update - December 2025

Check out the December 2025 Power BI Holiday Recap!

FabCon Atlanta 2026 carousel

FabCon Atlanta 2026

Join us at FabCon Atlanta, March 16-20, for the ultimate Fabric, Power BI, AI and SQL community-led event. Save $200 with code FABCOMM.

Top Solution Authors