March 31 - April 2, 2025, in Las Vegas, Nevada. Use code MSCUST for a $150 discount! Early bird discount ends December 31.
Register NowBe one of the first to start using Fabric Databases. View on-demand sessions with database experts and the Microsoft product team to learn just how easy it is to get started. Watch now
With an aggregation I get an unexpected result. The 'parent' table is as follows:
ROUTING_ID |
1 |
2 |
3 |
The 'child' table is as follows:
ROUTING_ID_From | ROUTING_ID_To |
1 | 23 |
1 | 24 |
1 | 25 |
2 | 23 |
2 | 24 |
Now I do a AggregateTableColumn with a List.Count, and I get as result:
ROUTING_ID | NrOf_ROUTING_ID_To |
1 | 3 |
2 | 2 |
3 | 1 |
Why has the last row (ROUTING_ID = 3) as number of Routings-To 1 instead of 0?
This is the line of code:
#"Aggregated qryRoutingTransitions_Direct2" = Table.AggregateTableColumn(#"Merged Queries3", "qryRoutingTransitions_Direct2", {{"ROUTING_ID_To", List.Count, "NrOfNextRoutings"}}),
Should I include that ROUTING_ID_To must not be null in order to not get counted as 1? Would be strange... If so: how to do that?
Solved! Go to Solution.
I've found the solution: instead of List.Count must be used List.NonNullCount.
I can confirm that the solution works, but could anybody explain why?! AggregateTableColumn returns empty tables which return empty lists for columns and List.Count of an empty list is 0, after all!
I've found the solution: instead of List.Count must be used List.NonNullCount.
Thanks! Big help.
March 31 - April 2, 2025, in Las Vegas, Nevada. Use code MSCUST for a $150 discount!
Your insights matter. That’s why we created a quick survey to learn about your experience finding answers to technical questions.
Arun Ulag shares exciting details about the Microsoft Fabric Conference 2025, which will be held in Las Vegas, NV.
User | Count |
---|---|
21 | |
16 | |
13 | |
12 | |
9 |
User | Count |
---|---|
35 | |
31 | |
20 | |
19 | |
17 |