The ultimate Fabric, Power BI, SQL, and AI community-led learning event. Save €200 with code FABCOMM.
Get registeredEnhance your career with this limited time 50% discount on Fabric and Power BI exams. Ends August 31st. Request your voucher.
In your organization, who manages your Fabric Capacity?
I have a line of business (LOB) user asking for permissions to manage our Fabric Capacity. From what I can tell, the only way to give that type of access is to grant the Fabric Administrator role. Our practice, though, is to keep Administrator roles within our IT department. So I'm curious what others are doing?
Solved! Go to Solution.
At our organization data and BI is outside of IT. The data and BI leads are the Fabric capacity admins. However, the power platform and azure admins are all in IT and there is coordination and regular communication between the groups.
I think as long as you have string internal controls, governance and your ISO is informed and in the loop either IT or the data team is fine to be the Fabric capacity admin.
Please mark this post as solution if it helps you. Appreciate Kudos.
Hi
Microsoft Fabric Capacity Management Approaches
Here are the most common industry practices for fabric capacity management:
Centralized IT Management: This is the most common approach and aligns with your current implementation. The IT department is responsible for all Fabric Capacity management and this:
Provides consistent governance
Optimizes the cost of capacities
Reduces security risks
Hybrid Model: Some organizations delegate certain capacity management functions to business units, while administrative rights remain with IT:
Capacity Assignment Administrator role can be given to LOB users
This role can manage capacity without granting full administrative rights
They can perform tasks such as resource allocation and workspace assignment
Business Unit Leadership: In this less common model, business units manage their own capacity:
Typically subject to central IT policies
Business units should have their own IT experts
A more agile but riskier approach
The best solution for your organization may be to continue your practice of keeping admin roles in the IT department, but offering more limited management capabilities to business unit users:
Fabric Workspace Administrator role (more limited than a full administrator role)
Fabric Capacity Assignment Administrator role
Custom-defined RBAC (Role Based Access Control) configuration
Most organizations in the Microsoft community prefer to keep most administrative functions in IT, while giving limited authority to business units for day-to-day operational tasks.
Hi @techresa
I hope this information is helpful. Please let me know if you have any further questions or if you'd like to discuss this further. If this answers your question, please Accept it as a solution and give it a 'Kudos' so others can find it easily.
Thank you.
Hi @techresa
I wanted to check if you had the opportunity to review the information provided by @burakkaragoz and @andrewsommer . Please feel free to contact us if you have any further questions. If their response has addressed your query, please accept it as a solution and give a 'Kudos' so other members can easily find it.
Thank you.
Hi @techresa
Thank you for reaching out microsoft fabric community forum.
May I ask if you have resolved this issue? If so, please mark the helpful reply and accept it as the solution. This will be helpful for other community members who have similar problems to solve it faster.
Thank you.
Hi
Microsoft Fabric Capacity Management Approaches
Here are the most common industry practices for fabric capacity management:
Centralized IT Management: This is the most common approach and aligns with your current implementation. The IT department is responsible for all Fabric Capacity management and this:
Provides consistent governance
Optimizes the cost of capacities
Reduces security risks
Hybrid Model: Some organizations delegate certain capacity management functions to business units, while administrative rights remain with IT:
Capacity Assignment Administrator role can be given to LOB users
This role can manage capacity without granting full administrative rights
They can perform tasks such as resource allocation and workspace assignment
Business Unit Leadership: In this less common model, business units manage their own capacity:
Typically subject to central IT policies
Business units should have their own IT experts
A more agile but riskier approach
The best solution for your organization may be to continue your practice of keeping admin roles in the IT department, but offering more limited management capabilities to business unit users:
Fabric Workspace Administrator role (more limited than a full administrator role)
Fabric Capacity Assignment Administrator role
Custom-defined RBAC (Role Based Access Control) configuration
Most organizations in the Microsoft community prefer to keep most administrative functions in IT, while giving limited authority to business units for day-to-day operational tasks.
At our organization data and BI is outside of IT. The data and BI leads are the Fabric capacity admins. However, the power platform and azure admins are all in IT and there is coordination and regular communication between the groups.
I think as long as you have string internal controls, governance and your ISO is informed and in the loop either IT or the data team is fine to be the Fabric capacity admin.
Please mark this post as solution if it helps you. Appreciate Kudos.
User | Count |
---|---|
17 | |
16 | |
6 | |
2 | |
2 |
User | Count |
---|---|
42 | |
22 | |
16 | |
9 | |
6 |