Don't miss your chance to take the Fabric Data Engineer (DP-600) exam for FREE! Find out how by watching the DP-600 session on-demand now through April 28th.
Learn moreJoin the FabCon + SQLCon recap series. Up next: Power BI, Real-Time Intelligence, IQ and AI, and Data Factory take center stage. All sessions are available on-demand after the live show. Register now
Hi experts, hoping I can pose this quetion for the think tank here.
It is not a technical question - but more of a operating model question.
In my org we've an application that is getting re-platformed to a Power Apps based application. The company building the new platform, lets call them NewX, had initially not considered the data team within the org(lets call the team MyX). And for reporting side of the application they suggested Dataflow gen 1 to bring the data and use that for reporting.
When I, as Data Analytics Manager, joined the project, I suggested using Fabric pipelines to land the data, then thruogh medallion architecture make the data available for reporting.
Contractually NewX is supposed to build and maintain reports. Hence I have suggested that MyX will build pipelines and semantic models, NewX can build reports. However, since there might be multiple models, the handshake between MyX & NewX will be complicated. So project & NewX are pushing for building Semantic models and Reports and MyX will build pipelines only.
I've not dealt with this situation where model and reports are built by separate people, let alone separate teams in this case.
Two reasons I want MyX to build models -
for better support model in future for any enhancement and upgrade
during build, model changes may warrant pipeline/upstream changes. Hence those who have access to pipeline should build models. It is true for report builders too, but their need is not as dire and can be waited out for MyX to change model.
What is your opinion on how to manage the builds of models and reports?
Thank you
Solved! Go to Solution.
Hi @CeeVee33,
The Microsoft Content Creator Security Planning article clearly identifies two types of creator roles: data creators, who develop semantic models, and report creators, who use those models to build reports. According to the Semantic Models in the Power BI Service documentation, ownership of a semantic model determines who can manage refreshes, security, and updates. This emphasizes the importance of distinguishing model ownership from report creation.
Microsoft Fabric adoption roadmap: Content ownership and management - Power BI | Microsoft Learn
Power BI implementation planning: Content creator security planning - Power BI | Microsoft Learn
Power BI modeling guidance for Power Platform - Power BI | Microsoft Learn
Semantic Models in the Power BI Service - Power BI | Microsoft Learn
Thank you.
Thanks @v-saisrao-msft that is great to see refernce guides.
Thanks @Mauro89. Good to know adoption roadmap is helpful kit.
Cheers
Hi @CeeVee33,
as mentioned by @v-saisrao-msft I highly recommend you to check out the following two resources:
Microsoft Fabric adoption roadmap: Content ownership and management - Power BI | Microsoft Learn
Power BI implementation planning: Content creator security planning - Power BI | Microsoft Learn
I had great experience especially with the material from the adoption roadmap. There are also helpful questions which shall be answered during the adoption and implementation phase. In your case I guess the most helpful part will be about answering the question about self-service vs enterprise delivery scope.
Hope this helps you out!
If so leave a kudos or mark as solution 🙂
Hi @CeeVee33,
The Microsoft Content Creator Security Planning article clearly identifies two types of creator roles: data creators, who develop semantic models, and report creators, who use those models to build reports. According to the Semantic Models in the Power BI Service documentation, ownership of a semantic model determines who can manage refreshes, security, and updates. This emphasizes the importance of distinguishing model ownership from report creation.
Microsoft Fabric adoption roadmap: Content ownership and management - Power BI | Microsoft Learn
Power BI implementation planning: Content creator security planning - Power BI | Microsoft Learn
Power BI modeling guidance for Power Platform - Power BI | Microsoft Learn
Semantic Models in the Power BI Service - Power BI | Microsoft Learn
Thank you.
Experience the highlights from FabCon & SQLCon, available live and on-demand starting April 14th.
If you have recently started exploring Fabric, we'd love to hear how it's going. Your feedback can help with product improvements.
| User | Count |
|---|---|
| 36 | |
| 24 | |
| 12 | |
| 11 | |
| 11 |