Advance your Data & AI career with 50 days of live learning, dataviz contests, hands-on challenges, study groups & certifications and more!
Get registeredGet Fabric Certified for FREE during Fabric Data Days. Don't miss your chance! Learn more
Hi,
In theory (and practice), is there a performance difference between a Real Time Dashboard and a Power BI report with DirectQuery to the same KQL source?
If yes, what are some main drivers for this performance difference?
Solved! Go to Solution.
Someone might kill me for writing this. 
the Power bi engine is not as fast as the Kusto engine to handle data.
with this said, then power bi tries to fold all queries to the Kusto engine for it to do all the work. Query folding from power bi is happening more often towards the KQL engine than the sql engine. 
so in theory the rtd would be more effective and performant when working with Kusto data than power bi. But I don't think you u will be able to measure a real experienced difference
cheers
A bit yes. This is one of the things that might slow down the performance in Power BI
Please remember to mark an answer as accepted so other people can find the correct answer to this question 😊
Someone might kill me for writing this. 
the Power bi engine is not as fast as the Kusto engine to handle data.
with this said, then power bi tries to fold all queries to the Kusto engine for it to do all the work. Query folding from power bi is happening more often towards the KQL engine than the sql engine. 
so in theory the rtd would be more effective and performant when working with Kusto data than power bi. But I don't think you u will be able to measure a real experienced difference
cheers
Thanks!
Yes, I am assuming that the required DAX -> KQL conversion will make the Power BI report a bit slower than the native KQL Real Time Dashboard.
Advance your Data & AI career with 50 days of live learning, contests, hands-on challenges, study groups & certifications and more!
Check out the October 2025 Fabric update to learn about new features.