March 31 - April 2, 2025, in Las Vegas, Nevada. Use code MSCUST for a $150 discount! Early bird discount ends December 31.
Register NowBe one of the first to start using Fabric Databases. View on-demand sessions with database experts and the Microsoft product team to learn just how easy it is to get started. Watch now
Hi all,
An issue I have been struggling with for some weeks now (more like driving me insane tbh) is adding a column to my main data table showing what group an item belongs to. The group column should be based on the item name in the main table and a lookup table stored elsewhere.
It is quite important that it is done in M so it is done in the data modelling.
So basically I want the below output:
based on this lookup table:
I was thinking the solution would be something like this going into the column ***Desired solution***:
if Text.Contains([Item], [Lookup_value]) = True then [Lookup_return] else null
However, I believe that I hit a snag because I am evaluating a text against a list, but I am not sure.
Any and all help is appreciated
Best regards,
Christian
Solved! Go to Solution.
Hi @Schnohren
I think you can achieve your goal by merge and transform your table.
I build two sample tables like yours. I add a custom column in both tables for merge.
Merge = 1
Table1:
Lookup Table:
Choose Table1 to merge(lefter outer) two tables by merge columns.
Add a conditional column in New Table1.
Then we need to duplicate the New Table and group by Item to count null for each item.
We see item = pears 1 kg count = 10, others = 9, so we can distinguish that pears 1 kg = null others has result.
Merge New Table1 with this count table by Item, expand count column.
Remove "Merge","Lookup.Lookup_value","Lookup.Lookup_return" columns and remove duplicate column by selecting all remaining columns.
sort count column by ascending and sort Desired colution column by ascending.
Remove top 5 rows , count column and we can get the final result.
You can download the pbix file from this link: File.pbix
Best Regards,
Rico Zhou
If this post helps, then please consider Accept it as the solution to help the other members find it more quickly.
Hi @amitchandak ,
Thanks for your response. I don't think it quite qualifies, because in the example you referred we have a one-to-many relation where we have a key (the CustomerName).
Here I want to check the Item column to see if it conatins any of the strings you can find in the Lookup_value column from the other table. Ideally, i would like to return the corresponding Lookup_return value.
\Christian
Hi @Schnohren
I think you can achieve your goal by merge and transform your table.
I build two sample tables like yours. I add a custom column in both tables for merge.
Merge = 1
Table1:
Lookup Table:
Choose Table1 to merge(lefter outer) two tables by merge columns.
Add a conditional column in New Table1.
Then we need to duplicate the New Table and group by Item to count null for each item.
We see item = pears 1 kg count = 10, others = 9, so we can distinguish that pears 1 kg = null others has result.
Merge New Table1 with this count table by Item, expand count column.
Remove "Merge","Lookup.Lookup_value","Lookup.Lookup_return" columns and remove duplicate column by selecting all remaining columns.
sort count column by ascending and sort Desired colution column by ascending.
Remove top 5 rows , count column and we can get the final result.
You can download the pbix file from this link: File.pbix
Best Regards,
Rico Zhou
If this post helps, then please consider Accept it as the solution to help the other members find it more quickly.
The lookup.Lookup_value never works. This is useless solution
@Schnohren , refer if this solution , if that can help
March 31 - April 2, 2025, in Las Vegas, Nevada. Use code MSCUST for a $150 discount!
Your insights matter. That’s why we created a quick survey to learn about your experience finding answers to technical questions.
Arun Ulag shares exciting details about the Microsoft Fabric Conference 2025, which will be held in Las Vegas, NV.
User | Count |
---|---|
134 | |
90 | |
90 | |
66 | |
58 |
User | Count |
---|---|
201 | |
137 | |
107 | |
70 | |
68 |