Forum Discussion
Verifying a two step invoice approval process
Hello community,
How would you solve this case where we need to verify whether a two step invoice approval process is legitimate or not?
I have two tables containing information about given approvals in phase A and phase B, and want to see if the invoices have been approved in accordance with the regulation.
Rules:
- If there is one A approver and one B approver, they cannot be the same person
- If there is one A approver then A is allowed to be one of many B approvers
- If there are more than one A approver then none of them can be a B approver
- If there are more than one A approver and more than one B approver, then at least one B approver must not be a A approver.
An alternate way of declaring the rules: Remove all B approvers from the A approvers set; if there are any remaining approvers then the process is legitimate.
Sample tables:
Phase A
InvoiceID_A | UserID_A |
A | John |
A | Sarah |
A | Brad |
B | Brad |
C | Brad |
D | Jane |
D | Sarah |
E | Jane |
Phase B
InvoiceID_B | UserID_B |
A | Sarah |
B | John |
B | Sarah |
C | Sarah |
C | Brad |
D | John |
D | Sarah |
D | Brad |
D | Jane |
E | Jane |
Expected Result
InvoiceID | (Result_UserIDs) | Result |
A | (null) | False |
B | John, Sarah | True |
C | Sarah | True |
D | John, Brad | True |
E | (null) | False |
Best Regards,
Daniel
Hi Daniel_L
Will this strategy work for you?
First create a new table with the distinct InvoiceIDs like thisInvoiceID = DISTINCT ( UNION ( VALUES ( 'Phase A'[InvoiceID_A] ); VALUES ( 'Phase B'[InvoiceID_B] ) ) )Then create a new calculated column using this code
Number of = VAR phaseA_approvers = CALCULATETABLE ( VALUES ( 'Phase A'[UserID_A] ); FILTER ( VALUES ( 'Phase A' ); 'Phase A'[InvoiceID_A] = InvoiceID[InvoiceID] ) ) VAR phaseB_approvers = CALCULATETABLE ( VALUES ( 'Phase B'[UserID_B] ); FILTER ( VALUES ( 'Phase B' ); 'Phase B'[InvoiceID_B] = InvoiceID[InvoiceID] ) ) VAR phaseB_approvers_not_approvers_phaseA = FILTER ( phaseB_approvers; NOT ( [UserID_B] IN phaseA_approvers ) ) RETURN IF ( COUNTROWS ( phaseB_approvers_not_approvers_phaseA ) > 0; TRUE (); FALSE () )Cheers,
Sturla
If this post helps, then please consider Accepting it as the solution. Kudos are nice too.
1 Reply
- sturlawsResident Rockstar
Hi Daniel_L
Will this strategy work for you?
First create a new table with the distinct InvoiceIDs like thisInvoiceID = DISTINCT ( UNION ( VALUES ( 'Phase A'[InvoiceID_A] ); VALUES ( 'Phase B'[InvoiceID_B] ) ) )Then create a new calculated column using this code
Number of = VAR phaseA_approvers = CALCULATETABLE ( VALUES ( 'Phase A'[UserID_A] ); FILTER ( VALUES ( 'Phase A' ); 'Phase A'[InvoiceID_A] = InvoiceID[InvoiceID] ) ) VAR phaseB_approvers = CALCULATETABLE ( VALUES ( 'Phase B'[UserID_B] ); FILTER ( VALUES ( 'Phase B' ); 'Phase B'[InvoiceID_B] = InvoiceID[InvoiceID] ) ) VAR phaseB_approvers_not_approvers_phaseA = FILTER ( phaseB_approvers; NOT ( [UserID_B] IN phaseA_approvers ) ) RETURN IF ( COUNTROWS ( phaseB_approvers_not_approvers_phaseA ) > 0; TRUE (); FALSE () )Cheers,
Sturla
If this post helps, then please consider Accepting it as the solution. Kudos are nice too.