Skip to main content
cancel
Showing results for 
Search instead for 
Did you mean: 

Calling all Data Engineers! Fabric Data Engineer (Exam DP-700) live sessions are back! Starting October 16th. Sign up.

Reply
gaetangoumaz
New Member

Value are not the same between table and graph

Hello all,

 

I am encountering an issue with my figures between table and graph representation...

As example, on my table, I have these value : 

gaetangoumaz_0-1729111564839.png

And within a graph I have the following :

gaetangoumaz_1-1729111923594.png

 

On my example June : 47 on table (which is the good one value) vs 70,32 on a graph...

 

Do you have any idea ?

 

For more information, on my table I have following agregation setting : 

gaetangoumaz_3-1729112076016.png

 

Whereas on the graph I have this one : 

gaetangoumaz_2-1729111979288.png

 

One assumption is that is 'simply' due to the agregate rule.

But.... there is no way to change it or to set as 'No agregate' on the graph.

 

Thank you so much in advance.

Regards

1 ACCEPTED SOLUTION

Hi @gaetangoumaz 

Unfortunately, I can't assist at this stage because I still don’t fully understand your data structure and what you are trying to accomplish. The most I can do is share a dummy file I use for demonstrating solutions. You can try to create something similar to what you need in that file, including the desired result.

If you manage to do so, please save it in a public cloud service and share it via an open link.

Regards,
Rita Fainshtein | Microsoft MVP
https://www.linkedin.com/in/rita-fainshtein/
Blog : https://www.madeiradata.com/profile/ritaf/profile

View solution in original post

6 REPLIES 6
gaetangoumaz
New Member

Hi @Anonymous  and @Ritaf1983 

 

Thank you to both of you for your answers

Yes I think unfortunately a dedicated column or calculated column has to be created...

 I still does not understand why Power BI can not apply the agregation on the axis mentioned. In my case this in simply city and date.

Is it a bug to raise to Microsoft or is not 'normal' such behaviour ? For me, who use other tools such as SAP BI, Cognos, etc, this is surprising.

Actually, understanding your answer, it means I should create a column (or measure ?) having which syntax ?

Is is calculate, averagex ?

 

I must admit being a little bit lost.

Thanks in advance.

 

Best regards,

Gaetan

Hi @gaetangoumaz 

This is not a bug; it's the logic of how the engine works. I can understand the confusion between when to apply aggregation to the graph, when to use a calculated column, and when to use a measure. It's important to fully understand the tool to "swim" through it with ease.

For your current needs, I'd be happy to try and help, but I need to better understand the data you have and what you're trying to achieve. This is why I recommended creating a small dummy version of your report (without sensitive data), saving it on a public cloud service (like OneDrive, Google Drive, or Dropbox), and sharing a link. This will make it easier to understand the exact problem and provide more specific guidance.

Regards,
Rita Fainshtein | Microsoft MVP
https://www.linkedin.com/in/rita-fainshtein/
Blog : https://www.madeiradata.com/profile/ritaf/profile

Hi @gaetangoumaz 

Unfortunately, I can't assist at this stage because I still don’t fully understand your data structure and what you are trying to accomplish. The most I can do is share a dummy file I use for demonstrating solutions. You can try to create something similar to what you need in that file, including the desired result.

If you manage to do so, please save it in a public cloud service and share it via an open link.

Regards,
Rita Fainshtein | Microsoft MVP
https://www.linkedin.com/in/rita-fainshtein/
Blog : https://www.madeiradata.com/profile/ritaf/profile

Thank you so much @Ritaf1983 for your reactivity.

I have tried to recreate a small and dedicated small model with sample data, but in that case (few rows), it works :(.

Actually I try both : Improve my 'sample' model in order to reproduce the case and then should be able to send it to you. And in parallel, I am trying to understang and solve the problem.
I have made som tries and few syntaxes, but I am not expert in DAX :(.

 

If this behaviour seems 'normal' to you, which syntax will you try on your side (column or measure ?) ?
Should I give explicitly the axes (in my case, the city and date) - even if I thought that Power BI will be quite clever to do it itself on a graph as it make it for the table ?

 

Thank you so much in advance.

Regards,

Anonymous
Not applicable

Hi @gaetangoumaz ,

 

Your idea is correct because different aggregations make different values displayed in the visual object and if you select the same aggregation then they will also display the same values.


In a table, you can choose not to aggregate because it displays the same categories over and over again, as you can see in the following two images.

vkaiyuemsft_0-1729480225517.pngvkaiyuemsft_1-1729480232935.png

 

Whereas in Line Chart, there will be only one point for the same classification, so there is no option of not aggregating.


Therefore, you can choose the appropriate aggregation in line charts or by creating your own measure or calculated columns to show the desired results.

 

If your Current Period does not refer to this, please clarify in a follow-up reply.

 

Best Regards,

Clara Gong

If there is any post helps, then please consider Accept it as the solution  to help the other members find it more quickly.

 

Ritaf1983
Super User
Super User

Hi @gaetangoumaz 

The difference in values between your table and graph is likely due to how aggregation is applied. Based on your images, it seems the table uses a single layer of data, whereas the graph appears to have a hierarchy. This difference means that aggregation behaves differently because the context changes, causing discrepancies.

Graphs in Power BI always require some form of aggregation (like a pivot table in Excel), even when tables can show individual values without it. This is why you're seeing different numbers; the graph aggregates based on the hierarchical context, which doesn’t match the table.

Ritaf1983_0-1729142181240.png

 

To better assist with resolving the issue, it would be helpful to see the PBIX file in English with the data structure you're working with, along with a clear example of the desired outcome. I recommend creating a dummy version of your report (without sensitive data), saving it on a public cloud service (like OneDrive, Google Drive, or Dropbox), and sharing a link. This will make it easier to understand the exact problem and provide more specific guidance.

If this post helps, then please consider Accepting it as the solution to help the other members find it more quickly

Regards,
Rita Fainshtein | Microsoft MVP
https://www.linkedin.com/in/rita-fainshtein/
Blog : https://www.madeiradata.com/profile/ritaf/profile

Helpful resources

Announcements
FabCon Global Hackathon Carousel

FabCon Global Hackathon

Join the Fabric FabCon Global Hackathon—running virtually through Nov 3. Open to all skill levels. $10,000 in prizes!

October Power BI Update Carousel

Power BI Monthly Update - October 2025

Check out the October 2025 Power BI update to learn about new features.

FabCon Atlanta 2026 carousel

FabCon Atlanta 2026

Join us at FabCon Atlanta, March 16-20, for the ultimate Fabric, Power BI, AI and SQL community-led event. Save $200 with code FABCOMM.