Join us at FabCon Atlanta from March 16 - 20, 2026, for the ultimate Fabric, Power BI, AI and SQL community-led event. Save $200 with code FABCOMM.
Register now!Learn from the best! Meet the four finalists headed to the FINALS of the Power BI Dataviz World Championships! Register now
The usage metrics report breaks out the view count into 3 distribution methods. 1. The app used to distribute the data 2. 'Sharing' and 3. 'Workspace'. What is difference between distribution method 1 and 2 when looking at view count? The numbers are so close in some instances that upon first glance it looks like it may be double counting the view count.
Solved! Go to Solution.
"Distribution shows how the viewers obtained access to a report: shared directly, through workspace access, or through an app. The Platform indicates the technology a viewer used to open a report: via PowerBI.com, Mobile, or Embedded"
https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/power-bi/collaborate-share/service-modern-usage-metrics
In 1. is when you publish the app and they view the reports there.
In 2. is when you share a direct link to a spcecific report
"Distribution shows how the viewers obtained access to a report: shared directly, through workspace access, or through an app. The Platform indicates the technology a viewer used to open a report: via PowerBI.com, Mobile, or Embedded"
https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/power-bi/collaborate-share/service-modern-usage-metrics
In 1. is when you publish the app and they view the reports there.
In 2. is when you share a direct link to a spcecific report
So does this mean any of the distribution methods are double counting or is the total view count for all distribution methods correct?
Share feedback directly with Fabric product managers, participate in targeted research studies and influence the Fabric roadmap.
Check out the February 2026 Power BI update to learn about new features.
| User | Count |
|---|---|
| 61 | |
| 60 | |
| 45 | |
| 18 | |
| 15 |
| User | Count |
|---|---|
| 108 | |
| 101 | |
| 41 | |
| 29 | |
| 29 |