Skip to main content
cancel
Showing results for 
Search instead for 
Did you mean: 

Join the Fabric FabCon Global Hackathon—running virtually through Nov 3. Open to all skill levels. $10,000 in prizes! Register now.

Reply
LairdLight
Frequent Visitor

Trying to achieve a filter equivalent to multiple relationships

Hi - I'm not sure if what I'm trying to do is achievable, I'm a novice at any kind of coding so any kind of help would be much appreciated....

 

I have a table with unique 'Application Group' values like this:

AppGroupSMEPhase
xJohn1
yLaura2
zSteve3



I then have a table with a row per integration between a source 'Application Group' and a destination 'Application Group' field, both of which are derived from the same 'Application Group' filed in the first table. Like this:

 

IntegrationSourceAppGroupDestinationAppGroup
d1xy
f1yx
f2yz
h7zx

 

I want to be able to filter my second table (and any associated visuals) using the application group field in the first table - where an application group appears as either a source or a destination. I've tried a few things but nothing I'm trying seems to work.

 

Thanks 

1 ACCEPTED SOLUTION
Phil_Seamark
Microsoft Employee
Microsoft Employee

Hi @LairdLight

 

This is a little rough but might be ok.

 

I created a new table based on your 2nd table but doubled the rows and introduced a Link column

 

Table 2 = UNION(
                    ADDCOLUMNS(Integration,"Link Column",'Integration'[SourceAppGroup]) ,
                    ADDCOLUMNS(Integration,"Link Column",'Integration'[DestinationAppGroup])
                )
				

This generates the following based on your sample data

 

multi join.png

I could then create a relationship from the new table to the slicer table using the new Link Column

 

link.png

 

Now on my report page, if I use a slicer over the Application Group, my visual based on the new table responds they way I think  you want it to.

 

slicer.png

 


To learn more about DAX visit : aka.ms/practicalDAX

Proud to be a Datanaut!

View solution in original post

2 REPLIES 2
Phil_Seamark
Microsoft Employee
Microsoft Employee

Hi @LairdLight

 

This is a little rough but might be ok.

 

I created a new table based on your 2nd table but doubled the rows and introduced a Link column

 

Table 2 = UNION(
                    ADDCOLUMNS(Integration,"Link Column",'Integration'[SourceAppGroup]) ,
                    ADDCOLUMNS(Integration,"Link Column",'Integration'[DestinationAppGroup])
                )
				

This generates the following based on your sample data

 

multi join.png

I could then create a relationship from the new table to the slicer table using the new Link Column

 

link.png

 

Now on my report page, if I use a slicer over the Application Group, my visual based on the new table responds they way I think  you want it to.

 

slicer.png

 


To learn more about DAX visit : aka.ms/practicalDAX

Proud to be a Datanaut!

Hi @Phil_Seamark

 

I've just applied your suggestion in my data model and it's definitely achieving the result I was aiming for.

 

Thanks very much for taking the time to solve this, much appreciated.

Helpful resources

Announcements
September Power BI Update Carousel

Power BI Monthly Update - September 2025

Check out the September 2025 Power BI update to learn about new features.

FabCon Atlanta 2026 carousel

FabCon Atlanta 2026

Join us at FabCon Atlanta, March 16-20, for the ultimate Fabric, Power BI, AI and SQL community-led event. Save $200 with code FABCOMM.

Top Solution Authors
Top Kudoed Authors