Skip to main content
cancel
Showing results for 
Search instead for 
Did you mean: 

Join the Fabric FabCon Global Hackathon—running virtually through Nov 3. Open to all skill levels. $10,000 in prizes! Register now.

Reply
SebV
Frequent Visitor

Transform static RLS to dynamic RLS dealing with many to many relations

Hi,

I try to make a static RLS dynamic, but can't sort out the DAX needed.
The datamodel has at table for users and each ueser is linked to a single departmemnt.
Each departmant is entitle to access certain area's, some om on the level of Counties, some on the level of Districts.

 

1. Scherm­afbeelding 2024-08-31 om 22.24.45.jpg

 

In the original situation static RLS defined the specific counties and districts for each department. Due to increasing number of roles there is a wish to make this dynamic.

 

2a. Scherm­afbeelding 2024-08-31 om 22.23.48.jpg

 

 

One of the problems is that the filter direction in the one to many relationship between Users and Departments is from Departments to Users. Therefore restrictin the User table with E-mail == USERPRINCIPALNAME() won't filter down the Departments table.

I tried different approaches to solve this:


Approach 1: the combination of DAX in RLS:
Table Users: [E-mail] == USERPRINCIPALNAME()
Table Departments: [Department] IN VALUES(Users[Department])
Table Departments - Access shoudl be filtered due to its relationship with table Departments
Table Areas: [County-id] IN( VALUES('Department - access areas'[Access area])) || [District-id] IN( VALUES('Department - access areas'[Access area]))

Unfortunately, this doesn't work.

 

Approach 2:
Restrict table Departments by: [Department] == LOOKUPVALUE(Users[Department], Users[E-mail], USERPRINCIPALNAME())
Table Areas: [County-id] IN( VALUES('Department - access areas'[Access area])) || [District-id] IN( VALUES('Department - access areas'[Access area]))

Doesn't work either

 

Approach 3:

Restrict table Departments by: [Department] == LOOKUPVALUE(Users[Department], Users[E-mail], USERPRINCIPALNAME())
Table Areas:
[County-id] IN( CALCULATETABLE( VALUES('Department - access areas'[Access area]), 'Department - access areas'[Department] = SELECTEDVALUE(Departments[Department]))) ||
[District-id] IN( CALCULATETABLE( VALUES('Department - access areas'[Access area]), 'Department - access areas'[Department] = SELECTEDVALUE(Departments[Department])))

Also doesn't work.

 

Anyone who has some valuable suggestions?

PBIX attached:

https://www.dropbox.com/scl/fo/a5fitksgp9hm4ycvf9gee/AG5QR3-1nKT8kaoPuBL1p7A?rlkey=ui12vthaw4f3mwdv2... 

1 REPLY 1
lbendlin
Super User
Super User

That's not what dynamic RLS is about.  In Dynamic RLS you maintain a reference table that lists exactly which artifacts a user has access to. That reference table is controlled by USERPRINCIPALNAME, and in turn controls the rest of the data model.

Helpful resources

Announcements
September Power BI Update Carousel

Power BI Monthly Update - September 2025

Check out the September 2025 Power BI update to learn about new features.

FabCon Atlanta 2026 carousel

FabCon Atlanta 2026

Join us at FabCon Atlanta, March 16-20, for the ultimate Fabric, Power BI, AI and SQL community-led event. Save $200 with code FABCOMM.

Top Solution Authors