Total Value Column Measure

[Anonymous]

Hi guys,

I am trying to create a total values column with the total value (5930) appearing for each row.

The total value column i want to make should have 5,930 throughout all the rows but everytime i try to make a measure with such as sum(Values) , it ends up just giving me the value for each row rather than the value for every row.

Can anybody help?

[v-piga-msft]

Hi @Anonymous,

Please try the measure below.

Measure 2 = CALCULATE(SUM('Table1'[Amount]),ALL('Table1'))

Here is an example.

If you still need help, please share some data sample and your desired output so that we could help further on it.

Best  Regards,

Cherry

[Anonymous]

hi @v-piga-msft that solvesy issue though wouldnt that create a static non dynamic value. what if i wanted a totals measure like that but with just whatever value is filtered

[v-piga-msft · Accepted solution]

Hi @Anonymous,

Please modify that measure like below.

Measure 2 = CALCULATE(SUM('Table1'[Amount]),ALLSELECTED('Table1'))

Then it will show the sum of amount dynamically based on the filter.

Best  Regards,

Cherry

[munchkin666]

@v-piga-msft Thank you! it works in my case

[Anonymous]

It's not working in my case, does it work differently if the total of the column I'm trying to have repeated on each row is the total of a measure? 

In my case, I have the monthly percentage in each row, and would like to have the total year percentage repeated on the colum besides it (RAMA TEST). 


Can anyone help me figure this out? 

Thanks! 

[Anonymous]

Thank you @v-piga-msft i couldnt be more happy with the response

[AlB]

Hi @Anonymous

I'm afraid you provide too little info for a clear answer.

To get rid of the filter from the rows, try   SUM(ALL(YourTableName[Values]))

[Anonymous]

hi @AIB there isnt much context as i only want to be able to learn how to create a sum everything in a particular range defined by whatever is filtered or not. I saw this done in the definitive guide to dax though the way they did it seems to not yield the same results for me ( they just used a simple sum function and it seemed to ignore the row to row context of dax though i am not sure how )